Intended for healthcare professionals

Student Reviews

Minerva: March 2002

BMJ 2002; 324 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/sbmj.020388 (Published 01 March 2002) Cite this as: BMJ 2002;324:020388
  1. Martin Dennis, reader in stroke medicine1,
  2. Desikan Kamalakannan, visiting fellow2,
  3. Varadarajan Baskar, clinical lecturer2,
  4. John Usher, senior house officer2,
  5. Baldev M Singh, consultant1
  1. 1Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU
  2. 2Wolverhampton Diabetes Centre, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP

Minerva enjoys a good foot massage, but results from a small, single blind trial of reflexology for irritable bowel syndrome do little to dispel her scepticism about the therapy. Reflexology made no difference—statistically or clinically—to the experience of pain, altered bowel habit, or abdominal distension (British Journal of General Practice 2002;52:19-23). As this trial was designed in consultation with reflexology practitioners, their claims of success in cases where orthodox medicine has failed may have to be reassessed.

Patients sometimes get more than they bargained for when they're admitted to hospital. It's been suggested that on entering hospital each patient should be automatically warned about the 10% risk of nosocomial infections, because the consequences of not providing a warning might result in legal action on the issue of consent to treatment. But such warnings could result in a massive loss of confidence because hospital treatment is designed to cure or alleviate dangerous conditions, not make things worse (Clinical Risk 2001;7:242).

Having recently needed an inhaler and discovered for herself just how tricky they can be to use, Minerva was worried to discover that …

View Full Text

Log in

Log in through your institution

Subscribe

* For online subscription