Intended for healthcare professionals


Sleep attacks in patients taking dopamine agonists: review

BMJ 2002; 324 doi: (Published 22 June 2002) Cite this as: BMJ 2002;324:1483
  1. Carl Nikolaus Homann (nik.homann{at}, consultanta,
  2. Karoline Wenzel, registrara,
  3. Klaudia Suppan, registrara,
  4. Gerd Ivanic, consultanta,
  5. Norbert Kriechbaum, associate professorb,
  6. Richard Crevenna, registrara,
  7. Erwin Ott, heada
  1. a Department of Neurology, Karl Franzens University Hospital, A-8036 Graz, Austria
  2. b Department of Psychiatry, Karl Franzens University Hospital
  1. Correspondence to: C N Homann
  • Accepted 17 May 2002


Objectives: To assess the evidence for the existence and prevalence of sleep attacks in patients taking dopamine agonists for Parkinson's disease, the type of drugs implicated, and strategies for prevention and treatment.

Design: Review of publications between July 1999 and May 2001 in which sleep attacks or narcoleptic-like attacks were discussed in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Results: 124 patients with sleep events were found in 20 publications. Overall, 6.6% of patients taking dopamine agonists who attended movement disorder centres had sleep events. Men were over-represented. Sleep events occurred at both high and low doses of the drugs, with different durations of treatment (0-20 years), and with or without preceding signs of tiredness. Sleep attacks are a class effect, having been found in patients taking the following dopamine agonists: levodopa (monotherapy in 8 patients), ergot agonists (apomorphine in 2 patients, bromocriptine in 13, cabergoline in 1, lisuride or piribedil in 23, pergolide in 5,) and non-ergot agonists (pramipexole in 32, ropinirole in 38). Reports suggest two distinct types of events: those of sudden onset without warning and those of slow onset with prodrome drowsiness.

Conclusion: Insufficient data are available to provide effective guidelines for prevention and treatment of sleep events in patients taking dopamine agonists for Parkinson's disease. Prospective population based studies are needed to provide this information.

What is already known on this topic

Car crashes in patients with Parkinson's disease have been associated with sleep attacks caused by the dopamine agonists pramipexole and ropinirole

Whether sleep attacks exist, their connection with certain agonists, prevention or treatment, and the justification of legal actions are controversial

What this study adds

Sleep attacks as a phenomenon distinct from normal somnolence really do exist

They are a class effect of all dopamine drugs

Effective prevention and treatment strategies are lacking, although data are insufficient to justify a general driving ban


Increased daytime somnolence has long been recognised as a side effect of dopaminergic drugs, although there were no descriptions on sudden irresistible sleep attacks in clinical trials or national pharmacovigilance databases before the study by Frucht and others.13 Pramipexole and ropinirole were the first dopamine agonists associated with road crashes, but now all dopamine drugs are implicated. 3 4 The legitimacy of sleep attacks as a phenomenon distinct from normal somnolence has been questioned, and the associated medicolegal and social issues have generated much controversy.410

We aimed to determine whether sleep attacks do exist or whether they are indistinguishable from drug induced somnolence and excessive sleepiness, the prevalence of sleep attacks, which dopamine drugs are implicated, whether attacks are predictable and preventable, and whether they are treatable.


We searched for the key words “Parkinson” or “Parkinson's disease” or “parkinsonism,” and “sleep” or “narcoleptic” or “attacks” and a combination of these between July 1999 and May 2001. We did not search prior to these dates because there were no reported cases of sleep attacks until 1999.3 We identified relevant publications from electronic searches of three general biomedical databases (Medline, Embase, Pascal) and from hand searches of major neurological journals (Brain, Annals of Neurology, Archives of Neurology, Neurology, Movement Disorders, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, Journal of Neurology, Nervenarzt) and general medical journals (Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine, British Medical Journal), the abstracts of congresses (13th international congress on Parkinson's disease, international symposium on gait disorders, second international congress on mental dysfunction in Parkinson's disease, American Academy of Neurology 52nd meeting, 10th meeting of the European Neurological Society, sixth international congress of Parkinson's disease and movement disorders), and the reference lists of relevant articles.

Sleep attacks are defined as events of overwhelming sleepiness that occur without warning or with a prodrome sufficiently short or overpowering to prevent protective measures.10 Most of the reports we surveyed were issued before this definition was published, so the inclusion criteria for sleep attacks in these studies varied greatly. To overcome this methodological problem, we used the reported characteristics of the onset of the event and the reliability of witnesses to the event to grade these phenomena into sleep attacks (definite, probable, and possible), sleep episodes, and sleep events not otherwise specified (box).

Classification of sleep events

Sudden irresistible sleep attack

Explicitly stated that event was sudden and irresistible, or description of event is as such that suddenness and irresistibility can be concluded—for example, patient fell into her dish while eating

Definite sleep attack

Suddenness and irresistibility of event is explicitly confirmed by reliable sources—for example, trained medical staff or objective relative not under psychological stress

Probable sleep attack

Suddenness and irresistibility of event is explicitly confirmed by sources with questionable reliability—for example, relative under psychological stress who was involved in car crash due to sleep attack

Possible sleep attack

Suddenness and irresistibility of event not confirmed by sources other than patient or account of confirming source not given

Sleep episode

Not sudden but irresistible onset of daytime sleep, particularly waves of sleepiness with sufficient prodrome to counteract mishaps

Sleep event not otherwise specified

“Sleep attack” or “sleep event” used in publication without explicit details on irresistibility or suddenness and without information on source reliability


We identified 20 publications covering sleep events in 124 patients (table 1). We classified sleep events into 96 sleep attacks (5 definite, 8 probable, and 83 possible), 4 sleep episodes, and 23 sleep events not otherwise classified. Overall, 38 patients were taking ropinirole, 32 pramipexole, 13 bromocriptine, 23 either lisuride or piribedil, 5 pergolide, 2 apomorphine, and 1 cabergoline. Eight patients were receiving levodopa monotherapy, and in two the dopamine agonist was not specified. Complete information on sex, age, and duration of exposure to the drug before the onset of a sleep attack was available in 33 patients (table 2). The age ranged from 34-87 years, and two thirds of the patients were male. Parkinson's disease was staged from Hoehn and Yahr 1 to 3, and the duration of disease ranged from 1-20 years. Two patients had sleep events on first exposure to the drug, but in the others they occurred with recurrent exposures (2 weeks to 20 years).11

Table 1.

Key characteristics and methodological quality of included studies

View this table:
Table 2.

Profile of patients with complete information

View this table:

Nature of sleep events

Circumstances around and before sleep attacks

The circumstances at the time of the sleep event were described in 29 patients, with several reporting more than one event. In 17 cases the sleep event happened during driving, leading to road crashes in 10. In 12 cases non-driving attacks occurred during standing (3 patients), walking (1), talking (3), eating (3), writing (1), and grooming a pet (1). Twenty patients had recurrent sleep events.

In 11 cases episodes of somnolence and in 10 cases non-driving attacks preceded an attack while driving. In three cases both somnolence and non-driving attacks were present in the patient before an attack while driving.

Montastruc and others found a strong association between dysautonomia and sleep events in 159 patients with Parkinson's disease.23 In two patients in whom genetic studies were performed, no HLA-DR2 serotype (narcolepsy associated haplotype) was found.21

Clinical and electrophysiological descriptions of time course

We identified six reports on 16 separate sleep events describing their exact time course: three with complete information and three with rudimentary information. Electroencephalography was performed in six patients, 5 14 21 but only three sleep events were captured in two of the patients. 5 21

We identified two distinct clinical courses from the available data: a sudden irresistible attack of sleep and sleep episodes.

Patients with sudden irresistible attacks of sleep suddenly fell asleep without warning signs.11 A patient described this as “not like falling asleep but more like a short circuit.”10 After two to five minutes, during which time the patients were not susceptible to painful stimuli, they abruptly recovered to full wakefulness, felt well but could not give any account of the preceding event. 11 13 21 Electroencephalograms showed a sleep latency of less than one minute.21 A mean sleep latency of 16.9 minutes suggested a normal background of wakefulness.

Patients with sleep episodes reported prodromal signs of tiredness—sometimes experienced as waves of sleepiness—followed by a slow and irresistible drowsing off, with sleep lasting about an hour. They could be awakened during this sleep but could not maintain wakefulness despite interventions.14 On awakening they acknowledged being asleep unwillingly.14 Two patients with waves of sleepiness showed a background of sleepiness in the mean sleep latency test.20

Epworth sleepiness scale

None of 79 patients with positive scores on the Epworth sleepiness scale had had sleep events in the past. 25 26 The scale comprises eight questions about falling asleep in inappropriate but tiring situations. Possible ratings for each question are 0 (never), 1 (slight chance), 2 (moderate chance), and 3 (high chance). A score of 14 or higher is considered indicative of excessive daytime sleepiness.26 Of the four patients tested who had had sleep events none showed a clear positive Epworth score (0, 8, 11, 12). 11 27 Lang found the scale to have a sensitivity for prediction of falling asleep while driving of less than 50%.28

Prevalence of sleep events

Two retrospective and seven prospective studies, totalling 1787 patients with Parkinson's disease, gave data on prevalence on sleep events. They occurred in 6.6% (range 0%-30%) of patients taking dopamine drugs (table 3). In Montastruc and others' study of 236 patients with Parkinson's disease, more sleep events occurred with ropinirole (41%) than with bromocriptine (36%), lisuride (27%), or piribedil (30%).29 But differences between agonists were not significant according to Hobson and others.30

Table 3.

Prevalence of sleep events in reported studies

View this table:

Treatment of sleep events

Treatment strategies were reported in 30 of the 123 patients (table 4). Active treatment was effective with modafinil in one patient with waves of sleepiness and with amantadine in one patient with possible sleep attacks. In 25 patients the drug dose was either reduced (10 patients) or discontinued (15 patients), which prompted either complete (22 patients) or partial (3) cessation of sleep events. Switching from one dopamine agonist to another was reported in three cases and brought about initial remission in two patients but recurrence in one. One of the two patients for whom remission of sleep attacks was initially reported represented after several months (W Pirker, personal communication, 2001). An adjustment of the intake schedule to the patients' need to be awake at certain times was successfully attempted in two patients taking levodopa.15 To avoid car crashes, one patient with episodic waves of sleepiness would pull over and take a nap if tiredness occurred while driving.15


Up to 30% of patients taking dopamine agonists for Parkinson's disease have sleep attacks. These are a class phenomenon, and their prediction, prevention, and treatment are yet to be solved.

The concept of sleep attacks has been disputed by several authors, who speculate that these episodes are but exaggerated daytime drowsiness.38 But recent detailed first hand reports by medical specialists are of particular value as they support the existence of two types of sleep events. 10 11 14 20

A limitation of our review is that publication bias might have led to an overestimation of the prevalence of sleep attacks. Also data were derived from clinics dealing with movement disorders, which might not be representative.

Dealing with sleep attacks and their consequences

Driving presents problems in patients with sleep events because of their decreased awareness of drowsiness over time and because passengers may not notice their reduced vigilance while driving.4 However, some potentially disastrous outcomes can be prevented.4 By definition the patients in our review experienced sleep episodes. Prevention of car crashes relies on the detection of patients at risk and advising them not to drive.

Table 4.

Effect on sleep events of changes in treatment strategy

View this table:

Secondary prevention has been proposed by using the Epworth sleepiness scale, multiple sleep latency test, and polysomnography as screening tools.4 Polysomnograms of 27 patients showed no strong association between excessive daytime sleepiness and disrupted night sleep.31 Analysis of past sleep events suggested that low sensitivity of screening tools might be increased by adding the inappropriate sleep composite score.30 This score was devised to examine the likelihood of falling asleep during five potentially stimulating activities. In contrast to most of the items of the Epworth sleepiness scale, sleep episodes while driving, eating, working, conversing, and doing household chores were thought to represent problematic and pathological excessive daytime sleepiness.30 The available data are limited and do not allow either to be considered a reliable predictor of future risks of sleep events.

Little is known about general risk factors of sleep events. Contrary to the findings of Montastruc and others more (70:53) patients in our review had sleep event while taking ergot dopamine agonists. 23 29 These findings have to be treated with caution, however, because of publication and selection bias. Preliminary data suggest that the risk of a sleep event is higher in patients with dysautonomia or males. 23 29 Currently neither a narcolepsy-like Parkinson's disease phenotype nor higher doses of dopamine agonists, duration of treatment, Hoehn and Yahr stage, age, or prior episodes of falling asleep can be considered specific risk factors for sleep events. 6 9 13 29 30 An intake of sedatives was also not predicative.29

With no reliable risk factor available, effective treatment is crucial to counteract the consequences of sleep attacks. Various strategies such as dose alterations or active treatment have been attempted but not in a controlled and prospective way. As switching from one dopamine agonist to another can lead to a recurrence of symptoms,3 it seems preferable to reduce the dose of drug. However in only 7 of 30 cases in which treatment modalities were provided did a reduction of dopamine agonist dose result in complete remission of sleep events. Remission was incomplete (but presumably tolerable) in three patients, whereas in 15 the drug was stopped by the doctor. Why this was done was never specified. Because long term side effects can be more disabling than disease related symptoms, low dose therapy that just meets the needs of the patient has become the rule.32 A reduction of dose would lead to a worsening of motor symptoms, counter to the primary aim of treating Parkinson's disease. But even in those patients for whom a reduction is initially tolerated, disease progression will inevitably lead to an increased dose, possibly with a renewed risk of later sleep events. These strategies therefore can not be considered good and permanent solutions.

Driving safety

The health authorities of Canada, the European Union, and the United States have asked the manufacturers of pramipexole and ropinirole to advise doctors to warn patients not to drive or engage in comparable risky activities while taking the drugs. 4 10 We found 17 cases where the sleep event occurred during driving, leading to road crashes in 10 cases. Despite the potential danger from driving, experts believe that sleep attacks are too infrequent to recommend that patients taking dopamine agonists for Parkinson's disease stop driving. 4 7 8 10 33 Studies suggest that whether or not patients with Parkinson's take dopamine drugs they do not cause more road crashes than age matched controls. 4 34 Recommendations for driving, other than informing patients of a potential risk, should be made with caution until more data are available.


We thank B Homann and R Robinson for their critical remarks on the manuscript.

Contributors: CNH conceived and designed the study, analysed the data, drafted the article, and supervised the preparation of the article. KW searched and evaluated the literature, analysed the data, and critically revised the article. KS hand searched and evaluated the clinical papers, interpreted the data, and drafted and critically revised the article. GI conceived and designed the study, interpreted the data, and drafted and critically revised the article. RC conceived and designed the study, searched and evaluated the literature, interpreted the data, and critically revised the article. NK conceived and designed the study, evaluated the literature, interpreted the data, and critically revised the article. EO conceived and designed the study, critically revised the article, and provided general supervision.


  • Competing interests None declared.


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
  32. 32.
  33. 33.
  34. 34.
View Abstract