Intended for healthcare professionals

Papers

Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites

BMJ 2002; 324 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7337.577 (Published 09 March 2002) Cite this as: BMJ 2002;324:577
  1. Funda Meric (fmeric{at}mail.mdanderson.org), assistant professora,
  2. Elmer V Bernstam, assistant professorc,
  3. Nadeem Q Mirza, research investigatora,
  4. Kelly K Hunt, associate professora,
  5. Frederick C Ames, professora,
  6. Merrick I Ross, professora,
  7. Henry M Kuerer, assistant professora,
  8. Raphael E Pollock, professora,
  9. Mark A Musen, associate professorb,
  10. S Eva Singletary, professora
  1. a Section of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Box 444, Houston, TX 77030, USA
  2. b Stanford Medical Informatics, Department of Internal Medicine, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, CA, USA
  3. c University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Health Information Sciences, Houston, TX, USA
  1. Correspondence to: F Meric
  • Accepted 22 January 2002

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the characteristics of popular breast cancer related websites and whether more popular sites are of higher quality.

Design: The search engine Google was used to generate a list of websites about breast cancer. Google ranks search results by measures of link popularity—the number of links to a site from other sites. The top 200 sites returned in response to the query “breast cancer” were divided into “more popular” and “less popular” subgroups by three different measures of link popularity: Google rank and number of links reported independently by Google and by AltaVista (another search engine).

Main outcome measures: Type and quality of content.

Results: More popular sites according to Google rank were more likely than less popular ones to contain information on ongoing clinical trials (27% v 12%, P=0.01), results of trials (12% v 3%, P=0.02), and opportunities for psychosocial adjustment (48% v 23%, P<0.01). These characteristics were also associated with higher number of links as reported by Google and AltaVista. More popular sites by number of linking sites were also more likely to provide updates on other breast cancer research, information on legislation and advocacy, and a message board service. Measures of quality such as display of authorship, attribution or references, currency of information, and disclosure did not differ between groups.

Conclusions: Popularity of websites is associated with type rather than quality of content. Sites that include content correlated with popularity may best meet the public's desire for information about breast cancer.

What is already known on this topic

What is already known on this topic Patients are using the world wide web to search for health information

Breast cancer is one of the most popular search topics

Characteristics of popular websites may reflect the information needs of patients

What this study adds

What this study adds Type rather than quality of content correlates with popularity of websites

Measures of quality correlate with accuracy of medical information

Footnotes

  • Funding Supported in part by Grant LM06594 from the National Library of Medicine (EVB).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Accepted 22 January 2002
View Full Text