The truth about handhelds
BMJ 2001; 323 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/sbmj.0108291 (Published 01 August 2001) Cite this as: BMJ 2001;323:0108291- David MacAllister, third year medical student1
- 1Glasgow University
Are you using a wireless application protocol (WAP) phone to book cinema tickets? How about the Internet to do most of your shopping? All right, what about CD ROMS for the majority of your medical learning and the Internet for the rest?
No? But when these technologies were introduced predictions were made that you would be doing just that. In fact, whenever a new technology emerges enthusiasts pop up with fanciful claims, just like the ones above.
Now, in medicine, the new technology that everyone is talking about is the handheld computer.
The handheld is the next big small thing--a phenomenon that has spread here from the United States. It began in business and journalism, but by 1999 a staggering 15% of US doctors owned handheld computers.1 With an even higher proportion of medical students owning handhelds, and given the fact that ownership is still growing, this is a remarkable feat for a device that is less than two decades old. Moreover, if US doctors were initially slow to pick up on handhelds, their British counterparts have not been.
Doctors seem to be the pioneers in Britain, and the “Psion organiser” was released in Britain …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £184 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£50 / $60/ €56 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.