Doctors' use of electronic medical records systems in hospitals: cross sectional surveyBMJ 2001; 323 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7325.1344 (Published 08 December 2001) Cite this as: BMJ 2001;323:1344
- a Kvalis project, Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
- b Kvalis project, Department of Computer and Information Science, Faculty of Physics, Informatics, and Mathematics, NTNU, Trondheim
- c Department of Bone and Joint Disorders, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Trondheim
- Correspondence to: Hallvard Lærum, 5.et.kreftbygget, Regionsykehuset i Trondheim, 7006 Trondheim, Norway
- Accepted 12 October 2001
Objectives: To compare the use of three electronic medical records systems by doctors in Norwegian hospitals for general clinical tasks.
Design: Cross sectional questionnaire survey. Semistructured telephone interviews with key staff in information technology in each hospital for details of local implementation of the systems.
Setting: 32 hospital units in 19 Norwegian hospitals with electronic medical records systems.
Participants: 227 (72%) of 314 hospital doctors responded, equally distributed between the three electronic medical records systems.
Main outcome measures: Proportion of respondents who used the electronic system, calculated for each of 23 tasks; difference in proportions of users of different systems when functionality of systems was similar.
Results: Most tasks listed in the questionnaire (15/23) were generally covered with implemented functions in the electronic medical records systems. However, the systems were used for only 2–7 of the tasks, mainly associated with reading patient data. Respondents showed significant differences in frequency of use of the different systems for four tasks for which the systems offered equivalent functionality. The respondents scored highly in computer literacy (72.2/100), and computer use showed no correlation with respondents' age, sex, or work position. User satisfaction scores were generally positive (67.2/100), with some difference between the systems.
Conclusions: Doctors used electronic medical records systems for far fewer tasks than the systems supported.
What is already known on this topic
What is already known on this topic Electronic information systems in health care have not undergone systematic evaluation, and few comparisons between electronic medical records systems have been made
Given the information intensive nature of clinical work, electronic medical records systems should be of help to doctors for most clinical tasks
What this study adds
What this study adds Doctors in Norwegian hospitals reported a low level of use of all electronic medical records systems
The systems were mainly used for reading patient data, and doctors used the systems for less than half of the tasks for which the systems were functional
Analyses of actual use of electronic medical records provide more information than user satisfaction or functionality of such records systems
Funding This investigation is funded by the Research Council of Norway through the Kvalis project (http://kvalis.ntnu.no/).
Competing interests None declared.
The study questionnaire and details of minimal requirements for electronic medical records systems appear on bmj.com
- Accepted 12 October 2001