Intended for healthcare professionals

Papers

Early enteral feeding versus “nil by mouth” after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials

BMJ 2001; 323 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7316.773 (Published 06 October 2001) Cite this as: BMJ 2001;323:773
  1. Stephen J Lewis, consultant (sjl{at}doctors.org.uk)a,
  2. Matthias Egger, senior lecturer in epidemiology and public health medicineb,
  3. Paul A Sylvester, specialist registrarc,
  4. Steven Thomas, senior lecturerd
  1. a Department of Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ
  2. b MRC Health Services Research Collaboration, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR
  3. c Department of Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol BS2 8HW
  4. d Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Bristol, Bristol BS1 2LY
  1. Correspondence to: S Lewis
  • Accepted 30 May 2001

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether a period of starvation (nil by mouth) after gastrointestinal surgery is beneficial in terms of specific outcomes.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing any type of enteral feeding started within 24 hours after surgery with nil by mouth management in elective gastrointestinal surgery. Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane controlled trials register) were searched, reference lists checked, and letters requesting details of unpublished trials and data sent to pharmaceutical companies and authors of previous trials.

Main outcome measures: Anastomotic dehiscence, infection of any type, wound infection, pneumonia, intra-abdominal abscess, length of hospital stay, and mortality.

Results: Eleven studies with 837 patients met the inclusion criteria. In six studies patients in the intervention group were fed directly into the small bowel and in five studies patients were fed orally. Early feeding reduced the risk of any type of infection (relative risk 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.54 to 0.98, P=0.036) and the mean length of stay in hospital (number of days reduced by 0.84, 0.36 to 1.33, P=0.001). Risk reductions were also seen for anastomotic dehiscence (0.53, 0.26 to 1.08, P=0.080), wound infection, pneumonia, intra-abdominal abscess, and mortality, but these failed to reach significance (P>0.10). The risk of vomiting was increased among patients fed early (1.27, 1.01 to 1.61, P=0.046).

Conclusions: There seems to be no clear advantage to keeping patients nil by mouth after elective gastrointestinal resection. Early feeding may be of benefit. An adequately powered trial is required to confirm or refute the benefits seen in small trials.

What is already known on this topic

What is already known on this topic Enteral feeding within 24 hours after gastrointestinal surgery is tolerated

Theoretically, early enteral feeding improves tissue healing and reduces septic complications after gastrointestinal surgery

What this study adds

What this study adds There is no benefit in keeping patients “nil by mouth” after gastrointestinal surgery

Septic complications and length of hospital stay were reduced in those patients who received early enteral feeding

In patients who received early enteral feeding there were no significant reductions in incidence of anastomotic dehiscence, wound infection, pneumonia, intra-abdominal abscess, and mortality

Footnotes

  • Funding None.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Accepted 30 May 2001
View Full Text