Implementing the evidenceBMJ 2001; 322 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/sbmj.0105141 (Published 01 May 2001) Cite this as: BMJ 2001;322:0105141
- Sarah Taylor, director of public health1
For a long time there has been ample evidence that variable standards of practice fail significant numbers of patients. Furthermore, even dramatically positive results from rigorous clinical studies can remain largely unapplied.1 However, we live in a world where there is increasing political and patient pressure to show the effectiveness of what we do as doctors, and standardising clinical practice is becoming everybody's business. We might agree that the practice of medicine is not reducible to a mechanistic, fault free system, however, health professionals owe it to patients to apply the most effective practice.
The situation must change
With the emergence of clinical governance, 2 there are now systems in place to govern the quality of care. In reality this generates an industry for the development of clinical guidelines and protocols, and concern to measure the extent to which practice follows these standardised pathways.
Cochrane's promotion of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) made the science of the evidence base common currency. 3 Guidelines are …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.