Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles.
Regretably our common systems of healthcare prefer to hide from the
actuality of their humanity than reveal threatening facts in their errors
and inadequacy. Laws or regulations don't change that. The fundamental
craftsmanship of legitimate and appropiate human service, warts and all,
is almost always lost to the incessant engine of industrial/medical
commerce. Healthcare has become merely a division of corporate principles
that cannot afford and are unwilling to address (an often positive)
biology unaddicted to stockholders ultimate gains in forms of profit for
some sector or other supplying the giant machine. This profit is not only
monetary but also is a hegemony of limited human creativity in the service
of narrow ideas on the purposes of living and the opportunities of
healing. It's no wonder almost no one wants reveal or draw any attention
to any weaknesses in the royal wardrobes.
Perhaps also such reporting has no renumerative billing code or
guarantee of agreeable compensation. Perhaps if a government body paid 30-
50% more if it came in a timely manner and had a fine system if it proved
to be older than a certain reporting time period things could shape up.