Title of Dr should be sufficient for all doctors
BMJ 2001; 322 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7286.617/b (Published 10 March 2001) Cite this as: BMJ 2001;322:617All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
The title Dr. is not a profession or Abbreviation of a Job
description. It is a title. Just like Sir.
One should understand the distinction between a title and the job.
Physicians should not use the their job as their title in front of
their names.
I respect the British system of surgeons not using the title.
A.K.Jeelani Ph.D (Civil Engineering )
Competing interests:
Dr. Title should not be used by Physicians without research degrees.
Competing interests: No competing interests
I am not concerned about the use of the title Mr for surgeons,
perhaps it should be used by most medics. But I am amused by the pride
with which it is associated. I understand that most doctors in the UK do
not have a research degree and so I am of the view that usually 'Doctor'
is more of a job description than a title- rather like Postman Pat or
Fireman Sam.
Competing interests: No competing interests
Then we have the odd situation of the dentists who are currently
starting to espouse the title of "Doctor" - and yet they are clearly
surgeons (although only infrequently Fellows of the RCS). And if the poor
fellows are actually Fellows, what are they going to call themselves? Even
that isn't the end. I remember several years ago as more pharmacists began
to take PhDs the Royal Pharmaceutical Society was most insistent that they
do not use the title of "Doctor" in connection with retail pharmacy in
case the poor patient were misled. I haven't heard this gem now for some
years - which is perhaps a good job since taught doctorates in pharmacy
are now starting to appear. And finally, on the question of whether
Professor Doctor should be used, I can't imagine the Germans missing the
opportunity of calling such gentlemen Herr Professor Doctor...
Competing interests: No competing interests
Editor - I read with great interest the discussion of Loudon and
Crisp on the title of doctor. To mix up the story I will describe the
German situation: We have a clear differentiation between Drs. and
Mr./Mrs. Contrary to the UK, where the title tells us something about the
working field of the physician, the German differentiation is fully based
on having earned an MD-title (German term: Dr. med.) or not. Therefore,
German doctors are desperately trying to earn an MD-title to be called
"doctor" by the patients. Being called "just" Mr./Mrs. is a clear sign of
inferiority to "doctors". Mr./Mrs. usually do not get the position of a
head of department.
After having passed the preliminary medical exams, German medical students
are allowed to start with their MD-thesis. As the research interests and
abilities vary from student to student, but each individual desperately
tries to earn an MD title, the quality of a German MD-thesis varies
extensively.
Furthermore, as in Germany a PhD is also called "doctor" (of natural
sciences i.e.), patients may mix up the profession of a person called
"doctor" completely, e. g. when encountering a doctor for chemistry but
expecting a physician.
The disaster is completed by the title of professor. This title can be
only be achieved after having completed a second thesis, called
"habilitation" which may be compared to a high quality PhD thesis, usually
covering at least the authorship within twenty peer reviewed research
papers.
Having received the habilitation you are first entitled "Private lecturer"
and after approx. 4 years of continous research you can ask for the title
of an associated professor. There are about 10000 to 20000 medical
professors in Germany - most of them are head of departments in peripheral
hospitals and have stopped doing research.
The British system is not as absurd as it seems if you compare it to other
countries.
Competing interests: No competing interests
Unless surgeons actually WANT to allude to their erstwhile days of
barbaric butchery, they should drop their anachronistic "inverse
snobbery". As medicine and surgery are becoming less discrete, it makes
sense that all medical graduates should be addressed as "Dr".
However, I do not see the problem with those who hold a professorship
being called professors. The function of a title is to tell people around
them about who they are. For example, "Lord X" tells me that X is a peer.
What does a doctor do? He doctors (people). What does a professor do? He
professes (great knowledge). If doctors who doctor are addressed as
'doctor', then why should professors who profess not be addressed as
'professor'?
Another problem arises when one considers the PhD / DPhil degree. A
"Dr Y" could be a doctor in mediaeval French, but this person will not
doctor other people. Most people assume medical knowledge if told that
someone is "a doctor", so perhaps non-medical doctorates should not confer
the title "Dr"?
Anish Shah
Competing interests: No competing interests
I entirely agree with the ambiguity of British system in addressing
surgeons as Mr. Few years ago we had this debate in Tasmania and had a
secret ballot among the surgeons there.Unfortunately, the proponents of
the Dr group lost by one vote-may be things will be different if the
voting is done now following your article.
Competing interests: No competing interests
Dear Drs
There is a skewed view in the UK/Europe that the Americans somehow see
themselves as "better" in some undefined way, but at least they do not
suffer from title-snobbery. Since I have been here (originally UK-trained
by Her Majesty's Government and its organ - the NHS) I have found the
American medical education/training system to be class and title-free, the
clinical and research meetings are open and anyone can ask a question. The
medical students opinion is as equal as the senior doctors view. Doctors
are called "Dr" and i have never heard of anyone being referred to as
"Professor" even though they may hold this academic title. So my chief is
Dr. Boss, but never Professor Boss or Dr med Boss or Mr Boss, despite the
fact that he holds a full professor title at the medical school. In the
clinic he is plain Dr. Boss and thats all. In fact when I return back from
a trip to the UK he often asks why I am even using his title and not just
his first name("are you being pompous and formal, again?). Its refreshing.
Competing interests: No competing interests
To the editor,
DR
1. Real Estate. dining room.
dr
1. door.
2. dram.
Dr.
1. Doctor.
2. Drive (used in street names).
dr.
1. debit.
2. debtor.
3. drachma.
4. dram.
Random House Webster's Electronic Dictionary and Thesaurus, 1992.
***************
It was with great surprise that I read Dr. Crisp's letter stating
that Mr and Miss would be possible addressing titles for physicians in
England, according to specialty.
I strongly agree with him that all MDs should be adequately called
"Doctors" and nothing else, due to reasons he mentioned. In Brazil, 100%
of the physicians are treated as "Dr." by peers and patients alike, with
very few exceptions reserved for old university "Professors". Academic
positions receive sometimes the "Professor Dr." treatment, but then only
in official documents and letters. Oh, and of course there are the quite
rare instance where you find some snobs wanting to be addressed by "Dr.
Dr." because of both MD, PhD degrees.
Nevertheless, many times I know I have done a good job to patients
when they start addressing me directly by my first name, without any other
qualification. Medicine, after all, is not in descriptive apellations...
Yours,
Carlos A. von Mühlen
Rheumatologist
Competing interests: No competing interests
i enjoyed your comment on titles of doctors. it made me think of a
physician here who recently was awarded a doctorate in medicine. i asked
him if i called him doctor doctor now. fortunately, he is very humble and
all he did was blush.
cheers
heather
Competing interests: No competing interests
As a Practical Matter Doctor(as Physician) is Quite Important
Knowing that "Sir" means that Paul McCartney was knighted is of
passing interest to me, but knowing that "Dr." means that William Wakeland
can treat my asthma is of far greater practical significance.
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests