Are “tomorrow's doctors” honest? Questionnaire study exploring medical students' attitudes and reported behaviour on academic misconduct
BMJ 2001; 322 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7281.274 (Published 03 February 2001) Cite this as: BMJ 2001;322:274
Data supplement
- Survey appears as supplied by author
University of Dundee
Medical Student Council
Survey of Fraud and Plagiarism
The Medical Faculty is concerned about the issues of fraud and plagiarism. The Medical Students Council feels that student’s views about these matters should be considered. We would be grateful if you would spend a few minutes to fill in this anonymous questionnaire.
Thanks.
Medical Student Council
Year of study: First o Second o Third o Fourth o Fifth o Gender: Male o Female o For each of the following scenarios 1-14, respond:
i. Whether you feel that John is wrong.
a. Yes
b. No
c. Not sure
ii. What penalty should be imposed for John.
a. Exclusion from the course
b. Repeat the year
c. Work/exam declared void/repeated
d. Core revision module in ethics
e. No action
iii. Have you done or would you consider doing the above.
a. Yes
b. No
c. Not sure
1. John forges Dr Cloony’s signature on a piece of work (e.g. patient presentation, record of achievement). i.............. ii............. iii............ 2. John copies answers in a degree exam from Jean. i.............. ii............. iii............ 3. John chats to Jean about the OSCE Jean has just completed and John is about to go into. i.............. ii............. iii............ 4. John copies from textbooks or published papers and lists them as references. i.............. ii............. iii............ 5. John copies directly from textbooks or published papers without acknowledging the source. i.............. ii............. iii............ 6. John copies Jean’s work (e.g. patient presentation, SSM report, case discussion) i.............. ii............. iii............ 7. John lends Jean his work to look at, and she copies it without telling him. i.............. ii............. iii............ 8. John lends Jean his work to copy. i.............. ii............. iii............ 9. John writes a piece of work (e.g. patient presentation etc.) for Jean. i.............. ii............. iii............ 10. John writes "Nervous system examination – normal" in his patient presentation when he hasn’t performed the procedure. i.............. ii............. iii............ 11. John resubmits work already submitted for a different part of the course. (e.g. a special study module report for his fourth year project.) i.............. ii............. iii............ 12. John submits his thesis from a previous degree for his special study module. i.............. ii............. iii............ 13. John submits work submitted the previous year by his senior. i.............. ii............. iii............ 14. John and Jean submit the same SSM report. i.............. ii............. iii............ Which, if any, of the above scenarios do you consider to be serious misconduct?................................................................
Should students inform faculty if they are aware of other students serious misconduct? Yes o No o Not Sure o Have you or would you inform faculty of another students serious misconduct? Yes o No o Not Sure o Should students sign a declaration for all written work stating it is their own work? Yes o No o Not Sure o Comments
Related articles
- This Week In The BMJ Published: 03 February 2001; BMJ 322 doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7281.0/e
- Editorial Published: 03 February 2001; BMJ 322 doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7281.250
- Editorial Published: 03 February 2001; BMJ 322 doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7281.296
- Letter Published: 26 May 2001; BMJ 322 doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7297.1307
- Analysis Published: 18 August 2015; BMJ 351 doi:10.1136/bmj.h4014
- Student Published: 11 September 2017; BMJ 358 doi:10.1136/sbmj.j2863
See more
- The BMJ Christmas appeal 2016-7: Orbis, the sight saversBMJ December 01, 2016, 355 i6425; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6425
- A musical about malignancyBMJ November 23, 2016, 355 i6318; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6318
- Round-up from Leaders in Healthcare conferenceBMJ November 08, 2016, 355 i5977; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5977
- Why can’t the NHS value junior staff the way top companies do?BMJ October 26, 2016, 355 i5740; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5740
- Reduce NHS’s reliance on migrants, HEE is toldBMJ October 18, 2016, 354 i5614; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5614
Cited by...
- What counts as cheating during medical school exams?
- "Lifting the carpet" on cheating in medical school exams
- Student Acceptability of High-Stakes e-Assessment in Dental Education: Using Privacy Screen Filters to Control Cheating
- Attitudes Towards Students Who Plagiarize: A Dental Hygiene Faculty Perspective
- Croatian medical students see academic dishonesty as an acceptable behaviour: a cross-sectional multicampus study
- Dishonesty in the MRCP(UK) Part 1 and Part 2 written examinations: prevention, detection and possible remediation
- Effect of Dispositional Traits on Pharmacy Students Attitude Toward Cheating
- Secrets and lies
- The Objective Structured Clinical Examination and student collusion: marks do not tell the whole truth
- Helping medical students to find their moral compasses: ethics teaching for second and third year undergraduates
- Response from Dundee Medical Student Council to "media misinterpretation"
- Differences in medical students' attitudes to academic misconduct and reported behaviour across the years--a questionnaire study
- Misled and confused? Telling the public about MMR vaccine safety
- Medical students see that academic misconduct is common
- Cheating at medical school
- Cheating at medical school