Research into complementary and alternative medicine: problems and potentialBMJ 2001; 322 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7279.161 (Published 20 January 2001) Cite this as: BMJ 2001;322:161
- Richard L Nahin (firstname.lastname@example.org), directora,
- Stephen E Straus, directorb
- a Division of Extramural Research, Training and Review, National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda MD 20892-2182, USA
- b National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
- Correspondence to: R L Nahin
The growing use of unsubstantiated complementary and alternative medicine therapies by people in the United States1 along with its increasing coverage by third party payers2 encouraged Congress to create the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) at the National Institutes of Health. The centre's mission is “to explore complementary and alternative healing practices in the context of rigorous science; to educate and training CAM researchers; and to disseminate authoritative information to the public and professionals.”3 To complete this mission, NCCAM supports publicly relevant and scientifically rigorous research to identify those complementary and alternative medicine practices that are safe and effective.
The centre's resources, although generous ($68.3m (£46m) for fiscal year 2000), are not sufficient to study all complementary and alternative medicine practices. NCCAM therefore developed criteria to help prioritise the many possible research opportunities (box). As part of the evaluation process, NCCAM seeks advice from its national advisory council, complementary and alternative medicine and conventional clinicians, members of the scientific research community, the public, sister federal agencies, and other stakeholders.
Many early clinical trials investigating complementary and alternative medicine have had serious flaws
Clinical investigations of complementary and alternative medicine are made difficult by factors such as use of complex, individualised treatments and lack of standardisation of herbal medicines
Other problems include difficulties in accruing, randomising, and retaining patients and in identifying appropriate placebo interventions
Despite these complexities, rigorously designed clinical trials are possible, including pragmatic studies of complete complementary and alternative medicine systems
Strong commitment is required from the research community to provide information about complementary and alternative medicines to the public and health professionals
Allocation of resources
Staff at the centre are often asked why limited resources are being spent on research that is perceived as replicating previously published work, especially when other western countries have …