Prophylactic treatment of migraine with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (lisinopril): randomised, placebo controlled, crossover studyBMJ 2001; 322 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7277.19 (Published 06 January 2001) Cite this as: BMJ 2001;322:19
- Harald Schrader (), professor of neurology,
- Lars Jacob Stovner, professor of neurology,
- Grethe Helde, research assistant,
- Trond Sand, professor of clinical neurophysiology,
- Gunnar Bovim, professor of neurology
- Correspondence to: H Schrader
- Accepted 9 October 2000
Objective: To determine the efficacy of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor in the prophylaxis of migraine.
Design: Double blind, placebo controlled, crossover study.
Setting: Neurological outpatient clinic.
Participants: Sixty patients aged 19-59 years with migraine with two to six episodes a month.
Interventions: Treatment period of 12 weeks with one 10 mg lisinopril tablet once daily for one week then two 10 mg lisinopril tablets once daily for 11 weeks, followed by a two week wash out period. Second treatment period of one placebo tablet once daily for one week and then two placebo tablets for 11 weeks. Thirty participants followed this schedule, and 30 received placebo followed by lisinopril.
Main outcome measures: Primary end points: number of hours with headache, number of days with headache, number of days with migraine. Secondary end points: headache severity index, use of drugs for symptomatic relief, quality of life and number of days taken as sick leave, acceptability of treatment.
Results: In the 47 participants with complete data, hours with headache, days with headache, days with migraine, and headache severity index were significantly reduced by 20% (95% confidence interval 5% to 36%), 17% (5% to 30%), 21% (9% to 34%), and 20% (3% to 37%), respectively, with lisinopril compared with placebo. Days with migraine were reduced by at least 50% in 14 participants for active treatment versus placebo and 17 patients for active treatment versus run-in period. Days with migraine were fewer by at least 50% in 14 participants for active treatment versus placebo. Intention to treat analysis of data from 55 patients supported the differences in favour of lisinopril for the primary end points.
Conclusion: The angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril, has a clinically important prophylactic effect in migraine.
Funding AstraZeneca provided the computer generated randomisation scheme, study medication, and financial support.
Competing interests HS and GB have been reimbursed by AstraZeneca, one of the manufacturers of lisinopril, for attending conferences. These conferences were unrelated to the present study.