Babies and consent: yet another NHS scandalBMJ 2000; 320 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7245.1285 (Published 13 May 2000) Cite this as: BMJ 2000;320:1285
But it should lead to improvements in research governance within the NHS
- Richard Smith, Editor
News p 1291
The chief medical officer of England has a slide that he often shows of a long list of scandals within the NHS. He must now add to his list the failures in the paediatric department in North Staffordshire Hospital (p 1291). A review of what happened in the hospital shows that the case is complex, but the story will probably play out in the media and in public consciousness as babies being entered into a dubious trial of a new treatment without their parents' consent.1 The worst single accusation is that consent forms were forged, and the police and the General Medical Council are investigating that possibility. At best, the North Staffordshire episode will lead to an overdue improvement in research practice throughout the NHS. At worst, it will further undermine public confidence in the NHS and doctors and lead to a proliferation in bureaucracy that will increase the difficulties of doing research.
The North Staffordshire review started out by examining complaints about consent for a trial of continuous negative extrathoracic pressure (CNEP) in premature babies, but the panel found that it had to consider other issues. These included other research, the …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.