BMA responds to proposals on the GMCGovernment wants to help GPsGPs angry at allocation of out of hours moneyNI doctors want to meet Tony BlairBMJ 2000; 320 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1280 (Published 06 May 2000) Cite this as: BMJ 2000;320:1280
BMA responds to proposals on the GMC
The BMA agrees that the powers of the General Medical Council should be enhanced to allow it to better protect the public.
In its response to the NHS Executive's consultation document, Modernising medical regulation: interim strengthening of the GMC's fitness to practise procedures, the association agrees that interim suspension should be possible where a doctor's conduct is putting patient safety at risk. It points out that suspension has severe implications for a doctor's income and contractual relationship. For GPs, the BMA suggests that the NHS tribunal would be a more effective body to order suspensions as this would protect doctors' pay and contractual relationships.
The NHS Executive proposes that doctors whose names are erased from the register should not be able to apply for restoration in less than five years. The BMA agrees with theGMC that the period should be three years. It points out that after five years it wouldbe virtually impossible for a doctor to make up the lost ground. It might be argued that a five year ban, which would amount to a life exclusion, would be in contravention of human rights …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.