Temperature measured at the axilla compared with rectum in children and young people: systematic reviewBMJ 2000; 320 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7243.1174 (Published 29 April 2000) Cite this as: BMJ 2000;320:1174
- Jean V Craig, research associatea,
- Gillian A Lancaster, lecturer in medical statisticsb,
- Paula R Williamson, lecturer in medical statisticsb,
- Rosalind L Smyth, professor of paediatric medicine ()a
- a Institute of Child Health, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool L12 2AP
- b Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX
- Correspondence to: R L Smyth
- Accepted 4 April 2000
Objective: To evaluate the agreement between temperature measured at the axilla and rectum in children and young people
Design: A systematic review of studies comparing temperature measured at the axilla (test site) with temperature measured at the rectum (reference site) using the same type of measuring device at both sites in each patient. Devices were mercury or electronic thermometers or indwelling thermocouple probes.
Studies reviewed: 40 studies including 5528 children and young people from birth to 18 years.
Data extraction: Difference in temperature readings at the axilla and rectum.
Results: 20 studies (n=3201 (58%) participants) had sufficient data to be included in a meta-analysis. There was significant residual heterogeneity in both mean differences and sample standard deviations within the groups using different devices and within age groups. The pooled (random effects) mean temperature difference (rectal minus axillary temperature) for mercury thermometers was 0.25°C (95% limits of agreement −0.15°C to 0.65°C) and for electronic thermometers was 0.85°C (−0.19°C to 1.90°C). The pooled (random effects) mean temperature difference (rectal minus axillary temperature) for neonates was 0.17°C (−0.15°C to 0.50°C) and for older children and young people was 0.92°C (−0.15°C to 1.98°C).
Conclusions: The difference between temperature readings at the axilla and rectum using either mercury or electronic thermometers showed wide variation across studies. This has implications for clinical situations where temperature needs to be measured with precision.
Funding JVC is supported by a grant from the Royal Liverpool Children's NHS Trust Endowment Funds.
Competing interests None declared.
Search terms, references, and eligible studies with missing or inappropriate data appear on the BMJ's website
- Accepted 4 April 2000