Medical tourism can do harmBMJ 2000; 320 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7240.1017 (Published 08 April 2000) Cite this as: BMJ 2000;320:1017
We are expatriate doctors living at 3900 metres in the Mount Everest region of Nepal and running a health care system serving a population of 10 000. The area is remote, mountainous, and roadless, with the villages scattered along high valleys. Over the past 32 years a health system of one hospital and eight health clinics has been established so that most residents are within an hour's walk of a health clinic or hospital.
The area is popular with tourists. Last year 19 000 visitors came into the Sagarmartha National Park where Mount Everest, the hospital, and five of the eight health clinics are located. Inevitably, there are many doctors and other healthcare professionals amongthem.
Can you realistically treat chronic disease after a single consultation?
Although the presence of the hospital is well publicised, many doctors touring the area hold ad hoc clinics along the trail. They often conduct these clinics just a 100 yards from the local village health clinic. At a time when we are developing the skills of the local resident health workers and increasing the confidence that the local people have in them such misdirected good will undermine progress in the existing health system.
Consider whether you are treating the patient for your own good or for theirs
It is inappropriate arrogance to assume that anything that a Western doctor has to offer his less developed neighbour is progress. These tourists are often working outside their trained specialty or have little concept of how that specialty applies to Nepal. They frequently don't understand local illness presentation, culture, or language. They often offer inappropriate treatment because they think they “must give something.” The consultations are often one off, with little possibility for follow up and the local health providers are left to pick up the pieces with no record of the consultation. If an unregistered Nepali doctor on holiday in the United Kingdom offered general medical consultations in a shopping centre there would be a public and professional outcry. The problem is extended when applied to nurses, paramedical staff, and medical students.
Furthermore, legally these doctors are on difficult ground. The Nepal Medical Council is striving to develop and maintain a professional body and requires all doctors who practise in Nepal to register with the council. For certain services, such as family planning, practitioners are required to have Nepali training certificates. This is setting a standard of medical professionalism that is required and respected in the West so it should be respected in Nepal.
We are seeing the development of medical tourism—exotic travel to a developing region with a brief opportunity to practise medicine on local residents. This seems to occur on two levels. Firstly, doctors travel independently to areas that seem to have no system of health care and while there perform good acts. We see this regularly with trekking doctors who give residents short courses of antibiotics, which is fine until you consider tuberculosis control and resistance. Recently, a chest physician gave one of our long term psychiatric patients an injection, but we don't know what it was. On the other hand, the acts performed in a life or limb threatening emergency are justified, but there should still be follow up with the nearest local provider.
The second level, which is more alarming, is the development of adventure holidays sold to groups of doctors specifically for the purposes of research or providing health care. The most recent example was an American group of two subspecialists and a selection of house officers and medical students who actively sought out patients along the trail without making any prior contact with the hospital and health posts along the way. They brought an ultrasound machine and a microscope. Can you realistically treat chronic disease after a single consultation? But working with the senior doctors we might have used the equipment and instruction with lasting benefit.
Medical work overseas can be constructive. It takes little effort to find out what health care exists in an area and for doctors to work with or refer to the local system. For more long term work there are numerous agencies in the United Kingdom and in other countries which recruit doctors to work in developing countries.
A fundamental principle of medical training is “first do no harm.” If as a doctor you cannot resist the lure of medical tourism and insist on the casual or opportunistic treating of local residents, consider whether you are treating the patient for your own good or for theirs, and whether your actions may actually do more harm than good.