Plant sterol and stanol margarines and health
BMJ 2000; 320 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7238.861 (Published 25 March 2000) Cite this as: BMJ 2000;320:861
All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
Law (1) makes the case for benefits of LDL-cholesterol lowering
sterol/stanol margarines and he mentions Benecol as an example of a
stanol (hydrogenated phytosterol probably linoleic esterified) spiked
margarine.
The U.K. Benecol website gives no data about the trans or any other
fatty acid content of their margarine but data from its U.S. counterpart
site suggests that the recommended 2 tablespoons per day also provide
about 2g (omega-3 and omega-6 derived) trans fats.
Two grams of trans fats is the daily maximum suggested by the
International Society for the Study of Fatty Acids and Lipids (ISSFAL;
April 1999: http://www.issfal.org.uk/adequateintakes.htm ). ISSFAL goes
further: "Therefore, the Working Group does not recommend trans-FA to be
in the food supply as a result of hydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acids
.."
It is well established that trans fats have deleterious effects on
blood lipids, on insulin resistance, and probably on heart-disease risk by
preferentially eliminating omega-3 fatty acids. Therefore, the over-all
benefits of trans fat containing sterol/stanol margarines must be
questioned, regardless their hypothesized benefit of LDL-lowering.
Apart from the obviously deleterious trans fats, the amount of omega-
6 linoleic in margarines like Benecol may well be near the upper limit of
6.6 grams suggested by ISSFAL.
The ingestion of high omega-6 products that are simultaneously low in
omega-3 and/or high in trans fats may well underlie heart and other
chronic diseases.
Therefore, compulsory Trans, omega-3 and omega-6 package labeling
(like those soon coming to Canada) would give consumers the much needed
information about possibly beneficial and deleterious ingredients in their
fat and oil products.
Eddie Vos ( http://www.health-heart.org)
Sutton Qc Canada
(1) Law M, Plant sterol and stanol margarines and health. BMJ 2000;
320:861-864.
Competing interests: No competing interests
Law presented a case for the introduction of plant sterol and stanol
containing margarines into the food chain for the primary prevention of
heart disease (1). There are however a number of concerns about such a
policy.
Phytosterolaemia, a very rare homozygous recessively inherited defect, is
characterised by increased absorption of plant sterols and accelerated
atherosclerosis, and it remains to be shown whether heterozygous carriers,
found with a greater frequency, are predisposed to accumulate these
compounds (2). As has been shown in many other human studies, a recent
study on cholesterol reduction by different plant stanol mixtures in
postmenopausal women (3) found a four-fold increase in serum campostanol
with the use of campostanol ester-rich margarine and a two-fold increase
in serum sitostanol with sitostanol ester-rich margarine. The serum
cholesterol precursor sterols were similarly increased by +12% to +19%
with stanol-ester containing margarine or butter. Although these
increases were considered to be meaningless, since other plant sterol
levels were decreased, it is possible that in some populations long term
increases in blood plant stanol or sterol levels may promote
atherosclerosis.
Law's paper suggests that people in their fifties would achieve a 0.5
mmol/l reduction in LDL cholesterol when consuming two or more grams of
plant sterol or stanol per day and that this would reduce the risk of
heart disease by about 25% after two years (1). Such a 0.5 mmol/l
reduction in LDL cholesterol is equivalent to a 0.6 mmol/l or 10%
reduction in total cholesterol. As a 1.5% coronary risk reduction per 1%
total cholesterol fall is regarded as realistic, a 10% cholesterol
reduction translates to a 15% reduction in major coronary events. In
controlled studies dietary change can reduce total cholesterol by 10 to
15%, but in free-living subjects less than half this reduction is
achieved. Hence it is likely that cholesterol lowering margarine, when
used by the general population, will achieve only an average 5% reduction
in total cholesterol with a large variability due to differences in
compliance and genetic heterogeneity.
A review (4) of cholesterol lowering margarines following the marketing of
two such products in the USA, concludes that the long term effect of these
products on mortality and morbidity from coronary artery disease is
currently unknown, and that the benefits of cholesterol lowering may be
offset by increased plasma plant sterol concentrations and reduced plasma
antioxidants such as beta-carotene (2).
The American Heart Association is also cautious (5): Alice Lichtenstein
warns that no studies have shown prophylactic effects and that these
additional ways of lowering cholesterol have small effects and should not
give people a false sense of security. Basic diet and lifestyle changes,
as has been recommended for years, rather than one easy change, is
advised.
In conclusion, I believe that there is not yet a good evidence base for
recommending the widespread use in the general population of cholesterol
lowering margarines in the prevention of coronary heart disease.
Charles van Heyningen
Consultant Chemical Pathologist
University Hospital Aintree
References:
(1) Law M.R. Plant sterol and stanol margarines and health. BMJ 2000,
320, 861-864.
(2) Thompson G. R. Plant lipids that lower serum cholesterol. Eur.
Heart J. 1999, 20, 1527-1529.
(3) Gylling H, Miettinen TA, Cholesterol reduction by different plant
stanol mixtures and with variable fat intake. Metabolism 1999, 48(5), 575
-580.
(4) The Medical Letter 1999, 41(1055), 56-58.
(5) Larkin M, Functional foods nibble away at serum cholesterol
concentrations. Lancet 2000, 355, 555.
Competing interests: No competing interests
Dr. Law pleads for an introduction of plant sterol and stanol
margarines into human food consumption arguing that these sterols lower
the serum cholesterol concentration and therefore also the morbidity and
mortality of ischaemic heart disease.1 This is wishful thinking only.
Before the statin era the same assumption gave rise to a host of trials
using dietary manipulations and/or a variety of drugs, but although these
trials lowered the cholesterol concentration, neither coronary or total
mortality was changed.2 A beneficial effect has been achieved with the
statins, but it was independent on the degree of cholesterol lowering;
coronary morbidity and mortality was lowered whether cholesterol was
lowered only a little or whether it was lowered very much, indicating that
the statins have other, more important effects than cholesterol lowering.3
4 Possibly, plant sterols may have beneficial effects also, but before
this has been proved in controlled, randomised and double-blind trials it
seems prudent to avoid a general usage of an unnatural food with
unfavourable effects on the absorption of antioxidant vitamins and the
flavour of the food.
1. Law M. Plant sterol and stanol margarines and health. BMJ 2000;
320: 861-4.
2. Ravnskov U. Cholesterol lowering trials in coronary heart disease:
frequency of citation and outcome. BMJ 1992; 305: 15-9.
3. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group. Influence of
pravastatin and plasma lipids on clinical events in the West of Scotland
Coronary Prevention Study (WOSCOPS). Circulation 1998; 97: 1440-5.
4. Sacks FM, Moyé LA, Davis BR et al. Relationship between plasma LDL
concentrations during treatment with pravastatin and recurrent coronary
events in the cholesterol and recurrent events trial. Circulation 1998;
97: 1446-52.
Competing interests: No competing interests
Why medicate the whole population?
I found the section on plant sterols very interesting and it seems
they do work to reduce cholesterol. My question is - why medicate the
whole population when not everyone has a cholesterol problem? Especially
children? And it seems these sterols do reduce carotene which I find a
worry. Aren't these antioxidants a defence against cancer? If people
want sterols then they should be made available in tablet form - I am very
much against medicating the whole population for the benefit of a few.
Keep our food and our medication separate!
Competing interests: No competing interests