Letters
Authors take issue with commentary on their paper
BMJ 2000; 320 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7236.713/b (Published 11 March 2000) Cite this as: BMJ 2000;320:713
- Lena A Sanci, fellow in adolescent health (sancil@cryptic.rch.unimelb.edu.au),
- Carolyn M M Coffey, epidemiologist,
- George C Patton, director,
- Glenn Bowes, professorial fellow
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne 3052, Australia
EDITOR—We commend the development of the BMJ's guidelines on educational interventions, which were used to assess our paper.1 At several points in Ker's commentary on our paper, however, she raises the need for further information. We recognised this need when we prepared the manuscript. We were also aware, though, of the constraints on space; articles in the BMJ should not exceed 2000 words, and providing the requisite information would have made our paper substantially longer. An alternative would have been …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.