Composite indicators may not be helpful in comparing health authoritiesBMJ 2000; 320 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7229.252/b (Published 22 January 2000) Cite this as: BMJ 2000;320:252
- Mark Reilly, epidemiologist (Mark.Reilly@emailtees-ha.northy.nhs.uk),
- Paul Johnstone, director of public health
- Directorate of Public Health, Tees Health Authority, Poole House, Middlesbrough TS7 0NJ
EDITOR—Mulley's editorial1 on the Department of Health's comparative data for health authorities2 and hospitals3 provides a balanced and constructively critical view. We, too, endorse the national initiative and welcome the opportunities to understand variations in population health and some aspects of care. But we have serious reservations about the use of composite indicators to compare health authorities.
As one example, we refer to the composite indicator for five year survival for breast and cervical cancer. Two districts with …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.