When can a risk factor be used as a worthwhile screening test?
BMJ 1999; 319 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7224.1562 (Published 11 December 1999) Cite this as: BMJ 1999;319:1562
Data supplement
AppendixIf the relatove frequency distributions of the variable associated with the disorder in affected and unaffected individuals are Gaussian (normal), the detection rate for a 5% false positive rate (DR5) is given by the area under the Gaussian curve (Φ ) for affected individuals, corresponding to a cut off level of (D- 1.645)/W, which can be looked up in statistical tables. Here 1.645 is the number of standard deviations (SDs) from the mean corresponding to the fifth centile for unaffected individuals, SDa and SDu are the SDs for affected and unaffected individuals respectivly, W is the ratio of the two (W=SDa/SDu), and D is the distance between the mean for affected individuals (Ma) and the mean for unaffected individuals (Mu) in SD units, so that D=(Ma-Mu)/SDu.
DR5=Φ [[(D- 1.645)/W]] (1)
The relative odds of having or developing a disease for people in the top fifth of the distribution of unaffected individuals compared with people in the bottom fifth (ROQ1-5) is equal to the ratio of the proportion of affected individuals in the top fifth to the proportion in the bottom fifth, that is:
ROQ1-5=Φ [[(D- 0.842)/W]]/[[Φ (- 0.842- D)/W]] (2)
where 0.842 corresponds to the cut off values (in SD units) which define the upper and lower fifths. Again, the two areas specified by Φ can be looked up in tables or determined using statistical software.
Having defined DR5 and ROQ1-5 in equations (1) and (2), equation (1) can be rearranged in terms of D and the expression for D can then be substituted in equation (2); the relation between them is then given by:
where Φ-1 (DR5) is the notation used to specify the cut off level required to obtain a given detection rate for a 5% false positive rate. Again this can be determined using statistical tables of the Gaussian distribution or statistical software.
The statistical basis of the terms given above can be found in standard statistical textbooks such as Armitage and Berry[1] and Chatfield and Collins.[2] The equations are simplified if the SD of the variable in affected individuals is the same as that in unaffected individuals, so that W=SDa/SDu=1. Using these equations we show selected DR5 values for ROQ1-5 in the table[t1], and in figs 3[f3] and 4[f4] we illustrate the relation between the two measures of risk for specific examples.
- Armitage P, Berry B. Statistical methods in medical research. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1991.
- Chatfield C, Collins AJ. Introduction to multivariate analysis. London: Chapman and Hall, 1980.
Related articles
- Analysis Published: 26 January 2011; BMJ 342 doi:10.1136/bmj.c6244
See more
- Doctors in Pakistan call for workers deported from the UAE to be screened for HIVBMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6544; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6544
- Time for guidelines on safety netting?BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6411; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6411
- The BMJ Christmas appeal 2016-7: Orbis, the sight saversBMJ December 01, 2016, 355 i6425; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6425
- Association between screening and the thyroid cancer “epidemic” in South Korea: evidence from a nationwide studyBMJ November 30, 2016, 355 i5745; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5745
- Overdiagnosis of thyroid cancerBMJ November 30, 2016, 355 i6312; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6312
Cited by...
- Predictive and Aetiological Potential of Polygenic Strata with Extreme and Moderate Disease Risks Predictions: Case Study of Coeliac Disease GWAS
- Predicting late-onset sepsis by routine neonatal screening for colonisation by gram-negative bacteria in neonates at intensive care units: a protocol for a systematic review
- Atherogenic Lipoprotein Subfractions Determined by Ion Mobility and First Cardiovascular Events After Random Allocation to High-Intensity Statin or Placebo: The Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) Trial
- Applying measures of discriminatory accuracy to revisit traditional risk factors for being small for gestational age in Sweden: a national cross-sectional study
- Joint British Societies' consensus recommendations for the prevention of cardiovascular disease (JBS3)
- Discordance of Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol With Alternative LDL-Related Measures and Future Coronary Events
- Genetics of Coronary Artery Disease
- Assessment of cerebral small vessel disease predicts individual stroke risk
- Baseline Mammographic Breast Density and the Risk of Invasive Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women Participating in the NSABP Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR)
- Enhancing Risk Prediction With PET Coronary Flow Reserve: Can It Be Clinically Useful?
- The risks in risk prediction
- Targeting 'high-risk' individuals
- Translational phases of evidence in a prognostic biomarker: a systematic review and meta-analysis of natriuretic peptides and the prognosis of stable coronary disease
- Pressure-cornea-vascular index (PCVI) for predicting disease progression in normal tension glaucoma
- Randomised controlled trial of screening and prophylactic treatment to prevent primary angle closure glaucoma
- The polypill concept
- How should we balance individual and population benefits of statins for preventing cardiovascular disease?
- The polypill concept
- A gene-based risk score for lung cancer susceptibility in smokers and ex-smokers
- C-Reactive Protein and Coronary Heart Disease: Predictive Test or Therapeutic Target?
- Carotid Intima Media Thickness and Plaques Can Predict the Occurrence of Ischemic Cerebrovascular Events
- Leukocytosis and Risk Stratification Assessment in Essential Thrombocythemia
- Letter by Janket et al Regarding Article, "Use and Misuse of the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve in Risk Prediction"
- Performance of Subclinical Arterial Disease Detection as a Screening Test for Coronary Heart Disease
- Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Disease: Molecular Basis and Practical Considerations
- Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Alternative Definitions of the Metabolic Syndrome: The Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study
- The prediction of disease risk in genomic medicine: Scientific prospects and implications for public policy and ethics
- Patient Self-Referral for Radiologic Screening Tests: Clinical and Ethical Concerns
- Performance, treatment pathways, and effects of alternative policy options for screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in the United Kingdom
- A strategy to reduce cardiovascular disease by more than 80%
- Risk factor thresholds: their existence under scrutiny
- Balancing Life-Style and Genomics Research for Disease Prevention
- Appraising organised screening programmes for testing for genetic susceptibility to cancer