Intended for healthcare professionals

Education And Debate Economics notes


BMJ 1999; 319 doi: (Published 02 October 1999) Cite this as: BMJ 1999;319:914
  1. David J Torgerson, senior research fellowa,
  2. James Raftery, professorb
  1. a Department of Health Studies and Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York YO1 5DD
  2. b Health Economics Facility, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2RT

    Until recently it has been common practice in economic evaluations to “discount” both future costs and benefits, but recently discounting benefits has become controversial. Discounting makes current costs and benefits worth more than those occurring in the future because there is an opportunity cost to spending money now and there is desire to enjoy benefits now rather than in the future. The reason why current spending incurs an opportunity cost relative to delayed spending is that a monetary investment yields a real rate of return and therefore there is a cost to spending money in the present.

    For example, if £100 were invested with a nominal return of 10%, in one year's time it would be worth £110; if inflation was 4% this would result in a real return of £6 on every £100 invested. If for some reason £100 of healthcare spending were delayed for one year then (assuming prudent investment) we could expect that in one year's time we would have £106 for healthcare investment.

    To take into account the opportunity cost of investing now rather than waiting one year we have to discount future costs. Therefore, if two healthcare interventions both released …

    View Full Text

    Log in

    Log in through your institution


    * For online subscription