Evaluation of NHS directBMJ 1999; 319 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7208.521 (Published 21 August 1999) Cite this as: BMJ 1999;319:521
Too early to draw conclusions
- Kevin McKenna, medical director, NHS Direct Northumbria
- Bondgate Practice, Alnwick, Northumberland NE66 2NL
- National Association of General Practice Cooperatives, PO Box 55, Leeds LS2 9SU
EDITOR—Florin and Rosen's observations about the limitations of the data published on the performance of NHS Direct were well made.1 Because the sites are still being established it will probably be another year before meaningful data can be produced for analysis.
The variability in the advice given by the different sites is inevitable given that NHS Direct uses three totally different triage systems Certain key ingredients are needed for consistency of outcome and demand management which are not present in all of the current systems in use. These features must be included in the national specification given to suppliers.
The consistent outcomes produced over 15 years in the United States by the system used in Hampshire and Newcastle (Personal Health Advisor, Access Health UK) gives confidence that a correctly designed tool, properly applied, does manage demand. It also produces consistency in clinical standards and delivers 24 hour access to services at levels that are appropriate and not demand led. Will NHS Direct do the same? By next …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.