Dynamics of bed use in accommodating emergency admissions: stochastic simulation model
BMJ 1999; 319 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7203.155 (Published 17 July 1999) Cite this as: BMJ 1999;319:155All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
Editor - Bagust et al’s simulation model suggests that failure to provide a
bed for patients in acute NHS hospitals in England should be infrequent at
current annual occupancy levels (79.5% in 1997-98)[1]. In the absence of
published data, their model corresponds to most clinicians’ experience.
Their projection of rapidly rising annual occupancy levels for all
acute specialties “which could exceed 90% by 2002-03” is implausible.
Average occupancy in acute specialties in Scottish NHS hospitals has risen
slowly because rising numbers of emergency and elective admissions and
falling bed capacity have been accompanied by falling average lengths of
stay[2]. Average occupancy rose by only 4.6% between 1980-98 (Table).
While occupancy statistics in English NHS hospitals are limited to 1996-97
and 1997-98 (79.5% in both years), long-term English and Scottish
occupancy trends are likely be similar[3]. In this respect the authors’
simulation model conflicts with past experience.
In the absence of total closure, the frequent disruption experienced
by patients and staff in acute hospitals at periods of high occupancy
results from long waits in Accident & Emergency Departments due to
delays in finding scarce beds and from the frequent failure to accommodate
patients in their consultants’ parent units. This leads to their
dispersal within the Medical Directorate (since most emergency admissions
are medical), extending to their wider distribution in other directorates
as occupancy rises. Long ward rounds to multiple wards and the
cancellation and postponement of elective surgical procedures follow,
contributing to rising stress levels in medical and nursing staff and
rising waiting lists. Far from planning to increase reserve bed capacity
as Bagust et al sensibly suggest, new hospitals being built by the Private
Finance Initiative will contain about 30% fewer acute beds than those they
replace[4].
In the absence of increased reserve bed capacity, our experience
suggests that pressures on acute beds can be alleviated by the appointment
of experienced senior nursing staff as bed managers with wide
responsibilities for the direction of inpatient “traffic” and for the
implementation of effective discharge planning policies.
TABLE
Changes in inpatient activity in acute specialities in Scottish NHS
hospitals between 1979 - 80 and 1997 - 98.
Year Inpatient Average discharges staffed beds 1979 - 80 508,360 18,144 1997 - 98 751,543 12,136 Change % + 47.8 - 33.1 Year Mean stay Occupancy (days) (%) 1979 - 80 10.8 71.9 1997 - 98 5.1 75.2 Change % - 52.8 + 4.6
REFERENCES
1. Bagust A, Place M, Posnett J W. Dynamics of bed use in
accommodating emergency admissions: stochastic simulation model. BMJ
1999; 319: 155-8.
2. Scottish Health Statistics. Edinburgh: NHS (Scotland)
Information and Statistics
Division, 1980-98.
3. Department of Health. Bed availability and occupancy. England,
financial year
1997-98. London: DOH 1998.
4. Pollock A M, Dunnigan M G, Gaffney, D, Price D, Shaoul J. The
private finance
initiative. Planning the “new” NHS: downsizing for the 21st
century. BMJ, 319: 179-84.
Matthew G. Dunnigan
Senior Research Fellow
Department of Human Nutrition, Royal Infirmary Glasgow G31 2ER
Myra M. McMurdo
Discharge Co-ordinator
Stobhill Hospital, Glasgow G21 3UW
Competing interests: Year Inpatient Average discharges staffed beds1979 - 80 508,360 18,1441997 - 98 751,543 12,136Change % + 47.8 - 33.1Year Mean stay Occupancy (days) (%)1979 - 80 10.8 71.91997 - 98 5.1 75.2Change % - 52.8 + 4.6
EDITOR -
I was pleased to see Bagust et al [1] demonstrating the value of stochastic
simulation in investigating the effects of different policies for
emergency admissions. They are correct to say that such approaches provide
a neutral way to develop better policies in practice, without the need for
dangerous and expensive experiments on the real system.
Using proper discrete simulation software it would not be difficult to
take this work rather further by showing, for example, the knock-on
effects of emergency admissions on the availability of beds for planned
admissions. This might enable the better management of available
resources.
Perhaps, too, health policy makers could be persuaded that analyses of
this type should become a routine way of investigating the effect of
changes before they are introduced?
Professor M. Pidd
Head of Department of Management Science
Lancaster University
Lancaster LA1 4YX
Competing interests: No competing interests
18/7/99
The Editor,
British Medical Journal,
BMA House,
Tavistock Square,
London. WC1H 9JR
EDITOR - I agree that a simulation model as described by Bagust et al
1 using a spread sheet is a valuable way of investigating the dynamics of
bed use. We have already described a similar system using a Smartware II
spreadsheet that showed the dynamic use of beds in an obstetric and
gynaecology unit. 2 Obstetrics inevitably has a high percentage of
"emergency" admissions.
In 1992 following the Changing Childbirth report there was increasing
pressure to reduce the size of the estate and the bed complement. The
required bed complement estimated from historical bed occupancy rates,
from other comparable units or calculated from simple formulae often lacks
credibility with clinicians. The dynamic spreadsheet approach allows "what
if" scenarios to be entered and can take into account variations in length
of stay, Caesarean section rates and community visits etc, and the staff
requirements for the level of activity. Too many beds leads to inefficient
use of resources while too few requires finding beds in other parts of the
hospital during periods of high admissions and the associated risks to
patients that this involves. We showed that such a model was a valuable
tool in change management, and it has proved a realistic simulation for
bed requirements since the change in bed numbers has been effected.
David J R Hutchon
Consultant Obstetrician & Gynaecologist
References
1 Bagust A, Place M, and Posnett J W. Dynamics of bed use in
accommodating emergency admissions: stochastic simulation model. British
Medical Journal 1999;319:155-8
2 Hutchon D J R. Using computer modelling for the rationalisation of
hospital beds. British Journal of Health Care Management 1997;3(6):332-4
Competing interests: No competing interests
The paper by Bagust et all indicates that overall the NHS may
currently be operating at 85% occupancy currently. Work we have been
carrying out with bed managers in Greater Manchester (Boaden et al, 1999)
recently indicates that occupancy is much higher than that already
(generally in excess of 90%). Measuring occupancy by a midnight bed count
may not be the most effective way of indicating the true pressure on beds,
since most trusts would need some beds empty at midnight to be able to
accomodate emergencies admitted during the night. A midday count would
give an even more dismal prediction of the number of bed crises likely to
occur (is it possible to have occupancy in excess of 100%?). The bed
crises that the paper refers to are, in our view, happening all too
frequently in many trusts and are not due in many cases to poor bed
management. If this paper serves to encourage bed managers in their
difficult work by showing that the problems they face daily in reconciling
supply with excessive demand are related to occupancy, not their own
professional competence, then it is of value. It should also encourage
senior managers to look again at how the bed resource is managed and at
the pressures on their bed managers. Local support networks, and the
sharing of best practice, as are operating in Greater Manchester, may go
some way towards improving the management of this scarce resource.
REFERENCE
Boaden R J, Proudlove N and Wilson M (1999)"An Exploratory Study of
Bed Management in 14 Trusts", Journal of Management in Medicine,
forthcoming
Competing interests: No competing interests
Relative effects of internal and external factors on emergency department efficiency
To accomplish their function with sufficiency, Emergency Departments
(EDs) require an appropriate balance between demand of care and ED
response. Different external and internal factors exert pressure against
EDs function that can lead to a decay in its quality, but the relative
influence of each factor on ED quality has been poorly explored. In their
theoretical assay, Bagust et al.1 underlined the necessity to spare
hospital beds to counteract the typical peaks of demand of emergency care
and avoid the risk of ED overcrowding during periods of increased external
pressure. We herein offer real data coming from an urban tertiary-care
university hospital (referral population: 500,000) which attends around
40,000 medical consults annually2,3.
During 3 consecutive weeks (from February 10 to March 2, 1999), we
recorded at 3 hours interval two different markers of overall ED
efficiency: "patients waiting for visit" and "waiting time for visit". To
evaluate effects of external factors on such efficiency markers, we
compiled patient arrivals during each interval; on the other hand, to
assess effects of internal factors, we attributed the main cause for
patient remaining in ED after medical assistance had begun to: 1) ED-
related factors (patients being visited or waiting for emergency
physician, obtaining complementary tests results, or clinical evolution);
2) ED-Hospital interrelation-related factors (patients waiting for
explorations performed outside of ED, or assessment by hospital
specialist); 3) Hospital-related factors (patients waiting for going to or
finding an inhospital bed); and 4) Non-Hospital-related factors (patients
waiting for family, social assistance, or ambulance). Results were
expressed as means±SD (range). The relationships between efficiency
markers and external/internal factors affecting ED dynamics were assessed
through simple lineal regression analyses.
During the studied period, 2,060 patients were visited. Occupation
rate of hospital was 89.9%, and beds daily offered for emergency
admissions were 36±10 (27-69). As average, waiting time was 85.8±100.8 (0-
470) minutes, waiting patients 5.8±6.2 (0-25), patient arrivals 11.7±6.6
(1-35), and patients remaining in ED after their assistance had begun
34.5±9.5 (17-65). As the table illustrates, while fluctuation of quality
markers was not associated with changes in external pressure, internal
pressure showed a positive, significant correlation with both markers,
being ED and H-related factors those causing such a correlation.
Table
Evolution of quality markers and external and internal pressure on ED along daytime (mean±SEM) .
Our results show that fluctuating patient arrivals to ED is not
associated with a decay in ED efficiency. Accordingly, efficiency should
be improved through the modification of ED internal dynamics. Among such
internal factors susceptible to be corrected, optimisation of the ED
processes themselves, disposition of beds all daytime, and spare enough
beds for ED necessities seem to be the most urgent issues to be improved.
Òscar MIRÓ,
Miquel SÁNCHEZ,
José MILLÁ.
Emergency Department, Hospital Clínic,
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Address for correspondence:
Dr. Òscar MIRÓ, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic.
Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Email: omiro@medicina.ub.es
REFERENCES
1.-Bagust A, Place M, Ponsett JW. Dynamics of bed use in accommodating
emergency admissions: stochastic simulation model. BMJ 1999; 319:155-158.
2.- Miró O, Jimenez S, Alsina C, Tovillas-Morán FJ, Sánchez M, Borrás A,
Millá J. Revisitas no programadas en un servicio de urgencias de medicina
hospitalario: incidencia y factores implicados. Med Clin (Barc) 1999; 112:
610-615.
3.-Miró O, Antonio MT, Jiménez S, de Dios A, Sánchez M, Borrás A, et al.
Decreased health care quality associated with emergency department
overcrowding. Eur J Emerg Med 1999; 6:105-107.
Competing interests: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 9h 12h 15h 18h 21h 24h 3h 6h p value*____________________________________________________________________________________________________