Use of randomisation in early clinical trials
BMJ 1999; 318 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7194.1352 (Published 15 May 1999) Cite this as: BMJ 1999;318:1352Theobald's trial in 1936 incorporated some aspects of randomisation
- Sjúr∂ur F Olsen, Senior epidemiologist (sfo@ssi.dk)
- Maternal Nutrition Group of the Danish Epidemiology Science Centre, Statens Serum Institut, DK-2300 Copenhagen C, Denmark
EDITOR—The issue of 31 October marking 50 years of the randomised controlled trial, with historical accounts on trial methodology, made me look up the trial undertaken by Theobald. He studied the combined effect of calcium, vitamin A, and vitamin C supplementation on toxaemia in 100 pregnant women, apparently using true individual randomisation. 1 2 This was in 1936, a decade before the streptomycin trial.3
Although not all aspects of the randomisation procedure are entirely clear from Theobald's report, 1 2 he was obviously a thoughtful researcher. He provided evidence that the groups had similar age and parity distributions, had a statistician (E S Pearson) to assess the extent to which his results (that symptoms of toxaemia were less common in …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £164 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£30 / $37 / €33 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.