Ethnic differences in incidence of stroke: prospective study with stroke registerBMJ 1999; 318 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7189.967 (Published 10 April 1999) Cite this as: BMJ 1999;318:967
- Judith A Stewart, lecturer in stroke medicinea,
- R Dundas, research associatea,
- R S Howard, consultant neurologistb,
- A G Rudd, consultant physicianc,
- C D A Wolfe (), reader in public health medicinea
- aDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Guy's, King's College, and St Thomas's School of Medicine, 5th Floor, Capital House, London SE1 3QD
- bDepartment of Neurology, St Thomas's Hospital, London SE1 5EH
- cStroke Unit, St Thomas's Hospital, London SE1 5EH
- Correspondence to: Dr Wolfe
- Accepted 10 February 1999
Objective: To identify ethnic differences in the incidence of first ever stroke.
Design: A prospective community stroke register (1995-6) with multiple notification sources. Pathological classification of stroke in all cases was based on brain imaging or necropsy data. Rates were standardised to European and world populations and adjusted for age, sex, and social class in multivariate analysis.
Setting: A multi-ethnic population of 234 533 in south London, of whom 21% are black.
Results:612 strokes were registered. The crude annual incidence rate was 1.3 strokes per 1000 population per year (95% confidence interval 1.20 to 1.41) and 1.25 per 1000 population per year(1.15 to 1.35) age adjusted to the standard European population. Incidence rates adjusted for age and sex were significantly higher in black compared with white people (P<0.0001), with an incidence rate ratio of 2.21 (1.77 to 2.76). In multivariable analysis increasing age(P<0.0001), male sex (P<0.003), black ethnic group (P<0.0001), and lower social class (P<0.0001) in people aged 35-64 were independently associated with an increased incidence of stroke.
Conclusions:Incidence rates of stroke are higher in the black population; this is not explained by confounders such as social class, age, and sex. Ethnic differences in genetic, physiological, and behavioural risk factors for stroke require further elucidation to aid development of effective strategies for stroke prevention in multi-ethnic communities.
Incidence rates of first ever stroke adjusted for age and sex are twice as high in black people compared with white people
This excess incidence cannot be accounted for by differences in social class in ages 35-64
Black people tend to have their first stroke at a younger age than white people
The excess incidence is found in all pathological types of stroke but is greatest for primary intracerebral haemorrhage
There is no difference between ethnic groups in case fatality up to 6 months after stroke
Incidence rates of first stroke in different white populations worldwide have been determined.1–3 A study in the United States showed a twofold increase in the incidence in one black population,4 but no data are available on black populations in Europe. Mortality from stroke, however, is higher among black people than white people in the United Kingdom and the United States. 5 6 In Britain, Caribbean immigrants have the highest mortality from stroke, with some evidence that this is due to increased incidence rather than case fatality. 7 8 Previous studies in black populations are difficult to interpret because of methodological inconsistencies. 7 9
In the United Kingdom there are targets to reduce mortality from stroke.10 These are difficult to attain without accurate incidence data. In 1989-90 a community stroke register in south London identified that ethnicity was associated with incidence of stroke in residents aged under 75 years.11 The south London stroke register was established to investigate ethnic differences in the natural history of stroke. We present incidence data for the first 2 years (1 January 1995 to 31 December 1996).
Details of register
A population based stroke register that recorded first stroke in patients of all age groups was set up with standard criteria.12 Data were collected prospectively by the registry team, comprising a neurologist and two nurses. By using 12 referral sources cases of stroke were identified in a defined area corresponding to 22 wards of Lambeth, Southwark, and Lewisham Health Commission. The total population (234 533) is 72% white, 21% black (11% Afro-Caribbean, 7.5% West African, and 2.5% black mixed), and 3% Asian, Bangladeshi, and Pakistani.13 Hospital surveillance of admissions for stroke included two teaching hospitals within and three outside the study area. Community surveillance of stroke included patients under the care of all general practitioners within and on the borders of the study area (n=147).
The notification sources were accident and emergency records; hospital wards; brain imaging requests; death certificates; coroner's records; general practitioners; hospital medical staff; community therapists; bereavement officers; hospital based stroke registries; general practice computer records; and “miscellaneous,” including notification by patients or relatives of patients. Methods used to ensure complete ascertainment of cases included personal visits to all general practitioners before the project started and 1 year later, and regular communication by telephone, posters, and quarterly newsletters.Use of a weekly stroke clinic or domiciliary visit by the study team were also available to general practitioners.
Death certificates with ICD-9 (international classification of diseases, 9th revision) codes 430 to 434 and 436 were validated according to clinical registration criteria. The Office for National Statistics notified the registry of any patients who had died.
Initial assessments were performed by a doctor (JS or AR). Registration criteria and data collected were checked with the patient's general practitioner and medical records. Patients with transient neurological deficits were included but if the deficit resolved within 24 hours they were not registered. Patients were examined within 48 hours of referral to the register when possible. Difficult cases were discussed (AR, RH) and a consensus reached before registration. Information collected at initial assessment included self definition of ethnic origin (1991 census question11) and social class (registrar general's codes based on occupation). Ethnic origin was stratified into three groups: black (African-Caribbean, black African, and black other), white, and other (Asian, Pakistani, Indian, Bangladeshi, Chinese, and other). Social class categories were grouped into non-manual (I, II, and III non-manual), manual (III manual, IV, and V) and economically inactive (student, unemployed, unable to work because of disability,being a carer, and retirement).
Classification of pathological type stroke (cerebral infarction, primary intracerebral haemorrhage, and subarachnoid haemorrhage) was based on results from at least one of the following: brain imaging performed within 30 days of onset of stroke (computerised tomography or magnetic resonance imaging), analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (in all living patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage in whom brain imaging was not diagnostic), or necropsy examination. Cases without pathological confirmation of subtype were unclassified.
The denominators for the calculations of incidence rate were the 1996 adjusted estimates of the 1991 census data from the Office for National Statistics for the study area with 10 year age groups (0-14; 15-24 to 75-84; >85). Incidence rates specific for sex and ethnic group were adjusted for age to standard European and world populations.To enable comparisons with the MONICA (monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease) populations, rates adjusted for age were also calculated for ages 35-64 only. Confidence intervals for the age specific rates and age adjusted rates were calculated by using the Poisson distribution. Incidence rate ratios for black to white were calculated by using Poisson regression with adjustment for age and sex. Incidence rate ratios were also calculated to examine ethnic differences in incidence for each pathological type of stroke with adjustment for age and sex. As social class data are ill defined in those aged under 35 or over 64, a further Poisson regression, adjusted for age, sex, and social class, was performed on cases in patients aged 35-64. Case fatality rates were calculated at 7, 28, 90, and 180 days after stroke. Logistic regression with adjustment for age and sex was used to compare ethnic groups.
The south London stroke register registered 612 patients with first stroke. Patients were identified by between one and five notification sources, with a median of three. The most common referral sources were hospital wards, death certificates, and hospital medical staff. One hundred patients (16.3%) were not admitted to hospital. Nine of these were identified after death.
Of the 612 patients registered, 289 were men; 489 were white, 102 were black, and 21 were classified “other.” The mean (range; SD) age of all first strokes was 71.3 (12 to 99; 14.4) years; 73.6 (12 to 99; 13.2) years for white people, 61.4 (17 to 94;16.2) years for black people, and 66.9 (49 to 87; 12.6) years for “other” (P<0.0001).There were 136 non-manual, 368 manual, and 108 inactive patients.
Pathological diagnosis of stroke subtype was confirmed in 536 cases.The distribution of each subtype was cerebral infarction in 419;primary intracerebral haemorrhage in 79; and subarachnoid haemorrhage in 43; 71 were unclassified. Of the unclassified cases, 19 (27%) were community patients and 20 patients (one community, 19 hospital) died within 48 hours of onset of stroke.
The crude total incidence rate per 1000 population was 1.31 (95% confidence interval 1.20 to 1.41); 1.25 (1.15 to 1.35) standardised to the European and 0.82 (0.75 to 0.89) standardised to the world populations. Incidence rates (age adjusted to the standard European population) were higher in men than in women (table 1). The incidence rate ratio for men compared with women showed a higher rate in men(1.3; 1.1 to 1.5; P<0.003). Across all age groups incidence rates were higher in black compared with white populations except in those aged 45-54 years (table 2). The incidence rate ratio adjusted for age and sex in black compared with white patients was 2.21 (1.77 to 2.76; P<0.0001). The incidence rates increased with age in all ethnic groups, and age was a significant independent factor (P<0.0001) (tables 1 and 2).
Social class for those aged between 35 and 64 was a significant independent factor. The incidence rate ratio between patients in manual (99 cases) and non-manual classes (31 cases) was 2.11 (1.37 to 3.25; P<0.0001). Thirteen patients (9%) were classified as economically inactive. Within the 35-64 age group the incidence rate ratios between black and white groups before and after adjustment for social class were 1.71 (1.17 to 2.49; P=0.005) and 1.53 (1.04 to 2.23; P=0.029), respectively. In this age range ethnicity was significantly associated with incidence of stroke after adjustment for age, sex, and social class. Irrespective of ethnicity, age specific incidence rates for all subtypes of stroke increased with age. The incidence rates adjusted for age and sex for each subtype of stroke were higher in black people than white people (table 3). The incidence rate ratios for black:white people were 1.99 (1.50 to 2.63; P<0.001) for cerebral infarction; 3.28 (1.83 to 5.77, P<0.001) for primary intracerebral haemorrhage; and 2.36 (1.2 to 4.63, P=0.013) for subarachnoid haemorrhage. The age and sex adjusted case fatality rates at 7, 28, 90 and 180 days showed no significant difference between ethnic groups (table 4).
The validity of any incidence study depends on complete and accurate ascertainment of cases. Core criteria for stroke incidence studies12 were incorporated by using standard definitions, a prospective study design, an adequate and defined population, and notification by multiple overlapping sources.
The most difficult cases to identify are non-fatal strokes in the community and non-fatal strokes in patients admitted to hospital while they are away from the study area. Both groups of patients could be identified by general practitioners' notification, regular prompting of general practitioners by the research team, checks on general practice diagnostic computer records, and regular checks of requests for brain imaging from outpatient departments when the referral history suggested a diagnosis of stroke. The methods used for patient notification helped to ensure as near complete case ascertainment as possible.
Population denominator data
The 1991 census data on the population denominator may not be accurate; no data were obtained for 2.2% of the population and underenumeration was highest in men aged 20-29 years.14 As incidence rates for stroke in all ethnic groups are low in this age group denominator underenumeration would probably not influence the ethnic differences found. Population growth, mobility, and cross boundary effects are difficult to estimate and may differ between ethnic groups. These factors, for which we have not been able to control, may influence observed incidence rates.
The total stroke incidence rate of 1.25 per 1000 population, age adjusted to the standard European population, was lower than that reported over 10 years ago in the Oxfordshire community stroke project (1981-6) (1.6 per 1000 white population).3 The estimates from the south London register are within the range of rates reported in registers in Europe and New Zealand. 15–17
This first European register that included black people has shown significant ethnic differences in stroke incidence. The adjusted incidence rate ratio of black:white people was 2.2 with an age adjusted incidence rate of 2.6 per 1000 black people. This compares with some of the highest reported rates worldwide (2.8 per 1000 in Japan and 2.9 per 1000 men in Finland).1 In one study among black people in the United States the incidence of first stroke that required admission to hospital or that was fatal and resulted in necropsy reported was 2.9 per 1000, 1.6 times greater than the rate reported in white people.18 The excess incidence of stroke among black people in the south London registry is similar to the 2.4-fold increase reported in the Northern Manhattan stroke study (2.2 in black people and 0.9 in white people per 1000).4
Pathological stroke type
We have shown increased incidence rates for all pathological subtypes of stroke in black people, with primary intracerebral haemorrhage having the highest black:white incidence rate ratio. Higher rates of haemorrhagic stroke in black people but of embolic strokes and extracranial occlusive vascular disease in white people have been reported in a number of hospital stroke series.19 In some hospital series ease of access to healthcare facilities and use of diagnostic tests differ between black and white patients, thereby introducing selection bias. 6 19 In the register there was no significant difference in incidence rates of unclassified stroke between ethnic groups.
Ethnic differences in social class have been suggested as contributory to the excess mortality from stroke in black people compared with white people in the United States.20 Adjustment for social class has not been performed in any published study on stroke incidence including black subjects. In the register adjustment of incidence rates for social class was possible only within the limited age range (35-64) for which census data on social class were available. There are problems with registrar general's coding of social class, particularly in the exclusion of housewives, carers, students, and the unemployed, but it was the only measure available. Although the reduced sample size of cases of stroke in those aged 35-64 meant that the confidence intervals of black:white incidence rate ratios after adjustment for social class were wide, ethnicity was still significantly associated with stroke incidence.
Increased incidence of stroke in lower socioeconomic groups in both black and white people in the register is consistent with social class variation in stroke mortality and incidence reported in other studies. 21 22
The excess incidence of stroke among black people compared with white people was not explained by social class, age, or sex. Differences in genetic, physiological, and behavioural risk factors that may account for ethnic differences in stroke incidence require further elucidation. A higher prevalence of hypertension and diabetes among black people compared with white people has been reported,23 and a recent study suggests ethnic differences in genetic predisposition to hypertension.24 Ethnic differences in these risk factors alone, however, do not account for the increased risk of stroke among black people. 5 7
Case fatality at 28 days was 26%, which is comparable with rates reported of 18% and 33% in two Italian centres.1 The 28 day case fatality rates for patients aged 35-64 years reported in MONICA were 15% to 49% in men and 18% to 57% in women; our rate of 17% (for the same age group) is towards the lower end of the ranges and comparable with rates reported in Nordic populations.1 Some studies have suggested ethnic differences in survival from stroke.4 In the register there were no significant differences in case fatality between black and white people up to 6 months after stroke.
We have shown important ethnic differences in the incidence of stroke. Investigation of ethnic differences in risk factors for stroke is needed to account for the excess incidence among black people to plan effective prevention and management of stroke in multi-ethnic communities.
We thank fieldworkers Elizabeth Richardson, Tania Collela, and Francis Bunn for their help with data collection and all general practitioners and general practice and hospital staff in the area who have supported the study.
Contributors: JS initiated and coordinated the formulation of the primary hypothesis, discussed core ideas, designed the protocol, particularly the documentation of clinical data, and participated in data collection, analysis, and writing of the paper. RD participated in the documentation, analysis, and interpretation of the data, quality control, and writing of the paper. RH initiated research, discussed core ideas, participated in protocol design, data documentation, and analysis, and contributed to the paper. AR initiated research, discussed core ideas, participated in protocol design, collection, documentation, and analysis of data, and contributed to the paper. CW, the principal instigator of the south London stroke register research project, initiated research, participated in the design and execution of the study, discussed core ideas, participated in the documentation, analysis, and interpretation of the data, and edited the paper. CW is the guarantor.
Funding Northern and Yorkshire Region Research and Development Programme. Glaxo Wellcome plc contributed a research and development grant.