PapersEffect of screening on incidence of and mortality from cancer of cervix in England: evaluation based on routinely collected statisticsBMJ 1999; 318 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7188.904 (Published 03 April 1999) Cite this as: BMJ 1999;318:904
- BMJ 1999;318:904 (abridged) (3 April)
Effect of screening on incidence of and mortality from cancer of cervix in England: evaluation based on routinely collected statistics
Mike Quinn, Penny Babb, Jennifer Jones, Elizabeth Allen on behalf of the United Kingdom Association of Cancer Registries
Members of the United Kingdom Association of Cancer Registries are listed at the end of the paper
Correspondence to: Dr Quinn
National Cancer Registration Bureau, Office for National Statistics, Demography and Health Division, London SW1V 2QQ
Mike Quinn, director,Penny Babb, senior cancer epidemiologist,Jennifer Jones, cancer epidemiologist,Elizabeth Allen, cancer epidemiologist
Objective: To assess the impact of screening on the incidence of and mortality from cervical cancer.
Design: Comparison of age specific incidence and mortality before and after the introduction of the national call and recall system in 1988.
Subjects: Women aged over 19 years.
Results: From the mid-1960s, the number of smears taken rose continuously to 4.5 million at the end of the 1980s. Between 1988 and 1994, coverage of the target group doubled to around 85%. Registrations of in situ disease increased broadly in parallel with the numbers of smears taken. The overall incidence of invasive disease remained stable up to the end of the 1980s, although there were strong cohort effects; from 1990 incidence fell continuously and in 1995 was 35% lower than in the 1980s. The fall in overall mortality since 1950 accelerated at the end of the 1980s; there were strong cohort effects. Mortality in women under 55 was much lower in the 1990s than would have been expected.
Conclusions: The national call and recall system and incentive payments to general practitioners increased coverage to around 85%. This resulted in falls in incidence of invasive disease in all regions of England and in all age groups from 30 to 74. The falls in mortality in older women were largely unrelated to screening, but without screening there might have been 800 more deaths from cervical cancer in women under 55 in 1997.
Invasive cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women worldwide, but 80% of cases occur in developing countries. The incidence of the disease has been falling in many western countries, but not in Great Britain, over the past 40 years. The cervical smear test was developed over 50 years ago, and screening began in Great Britain, some Nordic countries, and parts of North America in the 1960s.
Although cervical screening in England started in 1964, for over 20 years it failed to achieve sufficient coverage of women or follow up of all women with positive results. A national call and recall system was established in 1988. In 1996, 60% of district health authorities operated a 3 year recall. Financial incentives were first introduced with general practitioner contracts in 1990.
To assess the impact of the screening programme in England we examined trends in the numbers of smears taken and other characteristics of the screening programme; age specific trends for both in situ and invasive cervical cancer from 1971 to 1995; and age specific mortality from cervical cancer from 1950 to 1997.
Subjects and methods
The target age group for screening is 20 to 64 years; coverage is defined from 1995 onwards as the percentage of women aged 25 to 64 who had had a smear test in the previous 5 years (for 1988 to 1994, the previous 5 years). The cancer registration system has been described elsewhere. Both the ascertainment and quality of data from cancer registries in Great Britain are generally high.
Data on registrations of in situ and invasive cervical cancer from 1971 to 1991 are based on records of individual cases submitted to and validated by the Office for National Statistics. Figures for 1992 to 1995 are based on annual data supplied by the regional cancer registries. Information on the stage of invasive disease was not available centrally.We used published data on mortality from cervical cancer for 1950 to 1997, adjusted for procedural changes in the coding of cause of death.
The registrations of in situ cervical cancer are not true incidence because, firstly, the disease is asymptomatic and cases are detected only by screening. Thus any changes over time in the number of women screened in different age groups will affect the numbers of registrations. Secondly, as women are not all screened annually, registrations are a mix of cases diagnosed in women screened for the first time and cumulative incidence since the previous screen for women who have been screened before.
The annual age specific rates for both incidence and mortality were calculated as the numbers of cases divided by the estimated mid-year population. Summary rates for incidence and mortality were directly age standardised by using the European standard population (5 year age bands). Confidence intervals for age specific and age standardised rates were calculated on the assumption that the number of cases followed a Poisson distribution; the figures show typical 95% confidence intervals.
The number of smears taken rose by about 6% each year until the early 1980s, after which the increase was about 8% each year to the end of the decade; since then, about 4.5 million smears have been taken each year.[5 10-12] The coverage of the target age group in the screening programme rose from 42% in 1988 to 85% in 1994, a level subsequently maintained. Coverage increased in all age groups, but particularly for older women (55 to 64 years).
Carcinoma in situ
The registration rate of carcinoma in situ rose broadly in line with the increasing numbers of smears taken, from about 10/100 000 women (2100 cases) in 1971 to 80/100 000 (20 000 cases) in the mid-1990s. The apparent large increase in the rates in 1984 and 1985 is due to the inclusion for the first time of registrations of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III. Since 1987 the trends in registrations in women aged 20-24 and 25-29 have been continually upward, whereas women aged from 30 to 49 have shown no overall increase (fig 1). Registrations for older groups were consistently low and fell with age.
From 1971 to the mid-1980s incidence remained between 14 and 16/100 000 (on average 3900 cases a year) (fig 2). It fell for five consecutive years after 1990, reaching just over 10/100 000 in 1995, about 35% lower than in the mid-1980s. The 2900 cases diagnosed in 1995 represented 3% of all malignancies (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) in women. Age specific incidence has, however, changed differently in the various age groups (fig 3). In 1995, the overall pattern was similar to that in 1990, but the incidence in every age group from 30-34 to 70-74 was substantially (and significantly) lower--by on average 9/100 000 (110 cases).
Incidence varied considerably across the regional health authorities: the crude rates in 1990 ranged from around 11/100 000 (200 cases) in North West Thames to 23/100 000 (280 cases) in Mersey. Incidence fell in all regions between 1990 and 1995.
Fig 1 Age specific registrations of in situ cervical cancer in women aged 20-49, England, 1971-95
Fig 2 Age standardised incidence of invasive cervical cancer and coverage of screening, England, 1971-95
Fig 3 Age specific incidence of invasive cervical cancer in England for 1971, 1980, 1990, and 1995
Fig 4 Age specific mortality from cervical cancer, England, 1950-97
From 1950 to 1987 total mortality from cervical cancer fell steadily by just over 1.5% each year, from 11.2 per 100 000 (2500 deaths) to 6.1/100 000 (1800 deaths). The rate of fall then trebled, and by 1997 mortality had fallen to 3.7/100 000. The 1150 deaths in 1997 represented 2% of cancer deaths in women and 0.4% of all deaths in women.
Age specific mortality has, however, changed differently in the various age groups. In the youngest women (25-34 years) mortality trebled from around 1/100 000 (30 deaths) in the mid-1960s to a plateau of around 3/100 000 (100 deaths) in the mid-1980s (fig 4). Mortality in all the other age groups fell, but at different times.
For the cohort of women aged 25-34 in the mid-1980s--that is, women born in the mid-1950s--mortality was three times higher than it had been for women aged 25-34 in the mid-1960s.[13 14] Cervical cancer mortality in each birth cohort historically increased with age up to 60 years. If the raised risk and pattern of mortality are assumed for women born in the mid-1950s, by 1997 mortality would have increased to around 14/100 000 in women aged 35 to 44, and (with a similar projection based on a doubling of mortality for the cohort born in the mid-1940s) to around 19/100 000 in women aged 45 to 54. These rates are far higher than those actually observed (around 5/100 000 in both age groups (fig 4)). Applying the difference between the projected and actual mortality in 1997 to the number of women in each age group suggests that screening might have prevented 320 deaths in women aged 35-44 and 430 deaths in women aged 45-54. In addition, mortality in women aged 25-34 in 1997 was one third lower than in the peak in the mid-1980s so a further 50 deaths may have been prevented in this age group.
Cervical screening by the smear test meets some of the criteria for screening programmes laid down by the World Health Organisation, but not the two which are probably the most important: cervical cancer in England is relatively uncommon and its natural course is not well understood. Although the effectiveness of screening has never been properly demonstrated in randomised controlled trials, firm evidence comes from the Nordic countries, where the implementation of widely different policies resulted in sharply contrasting trends in incidence and mortality. Even so, many operational features of the cervical screening process in England have been heavily criticised.[3 17 18 19]
The annual cost of the screening programme is £132 million. This is about four times the cost of the breast screening programme, which aims to reduce annual breast cancer deaths in women aged 55 to 69 by 1250. Costs of cervical screening could be reduced substantially, with little loss in effectiveness, by screening all women every five years--there is little benefit but enormous increase in costs in opportunistic screening at shorter intervals than those recommended[3 16]--and by not continuing to screen women over 50 who have had two or three consecutive normal results.[20 21]
Before the introduction of the national call and recall system and of incentive payments to general practitioners the cervical screening programme in England was largely ineffective, owing mainly to problems of organisation.[1 3 16] Most cytological tests were performed on women presenting for obstetric, gynaecological, or contraceptive reasons. At least two thirds of women with invasive cervical cancer had never been screened; for women over 40 (among whom 70% of cases occurred) over 90% had never been screened.
Cook and Draper noted the large increase in incidence of carcinoma in situ and judged that screening might have prevented a potential increase in both the incidence of invasive disease and mortality. Parkin et al estimated that, up to 1978, screening had prevented 25% of potential cases of invasive disease. On the other hand, Murphy et al related the screening effort in different parts of Great Britain to variations in incidence, mortality, and hysterectomy rates and found no evidence that the burden of cervical cancer would have been higher without the screening programme.
The NHS cervical screening programme has recently achieved a high coverage of the target age group. It has particularly improved coverage of older women and women in lower social classes, who were most at risk and previously largely unscreened.[3 26] National guidelines for clinical practice and service delivery have been established, but there have been problems of implementation in inner cities.
If the introduction of national call and recall has had an effect, there should have been some increases in registrations of in situ disease; a small increase in the incidence of invasive cancer in areas or age groups where coverage was previously poor; a large fall in the incidence of invasive disease across a wide age range and in all parts of the country; possibly a down staging of invasive disease; and lower mortality than would have been expected. Our data show that these changes have occurred.
Registration of in situ disease has increased in parallel with the numbers of smears taken. It is difficult to distinguish increased incidence from improved registration, but changes in completeness are unlikely to produce artefactual trends which affect only particular age groups. There are, however, known problems of misclassification of cervical cancer, and in the North Western region under-registration of invasive disease was about 9% overall.
The plateau in the overall incidence of invasive cervical cancer up to 1988 concealed a complex pattern of changes in the age specific rates. The patterns suggest a cohort effect. Other analyses (including with age period cohort models) have indicated peaks in risk for women born at the end of the 19th century, in the mid-1920s, and after 1950. These women would have been in their late teens and early 20s, and hence becoming sexually active, at the times of the first world war, the second world war, and the introduction of oral contraceptives, respectively.
Since the introduction of national call and recall in 1988 there has been an overall fall of 35% in the incidence of invasive cervical cancer, reflecting falls in the age specific rates for all women aged from 30 to 74 years and in all regions of England. Studies based in the regional cancer registries indicate that since 1988 the distribution of stage has shifted towards earlier stages. And a retrospective case-control study of invasive cancers diagnosed in 1992 has suggested that without screening there would have been 2000 (57%) more cases, although this may be an overestimate. We therefore conclude that the fall in incidence is directly related to the increased coverage of screening.
Interpretation of trends in mortality data presents several problems. Firstly, mortality may be affected by changes in survival. But there have been no significant improvements in treatment for cervical cancer over the past 20 years, and there is no evidence that stage specific survival rates have improved substantially. Secondly, recording of cause of death may not always be accurate, and attempts to improve death certification may lead to artefactual changes. Thirdly, the proportion of deaths ascribed to `cancer of the uterus, site unspecified' has varied and will have decreased as death certification improved.
For mortality, as with the incidence of invasive disease, the long term downward trend which accelerated after 1988 concealed a complex pattern of changes in the age specific rates. These changes reflect the cohort effects in incidence.[13 14 31] Little, if any, of the observed long term fall in mortality up to the late 1980s can be ascribed directly to screening because relatively few women dying from cervical cancer aged over 55 years would have been screened, and it was in these women that the mortality was highest and the falls were largest. The situation for younger women, however, is different. Raffle estimated that for women born since 1930, screening prevented about 660 deaths in 1995. The latest data indicate that for women aged 25 to 54 screening might have prevented 800 deaths from cervical cancer in 1997.
Members registries (directors) of the United Kingdom Association of Cancer Registries are: East Anglian (C H Brown, T W Davies), Information and Statistics Division of the NHS in Scotland (D Brewster), Merseyside and Cheshire (E M I Williams), North Western (C B J Woodman), Northern and Yorkshire (D Forman), Northern Ireland (A Gavin), Office for National Statistics (M J Quinn), Oxford (M Roche), South and West (J A E Smith), Thames (G Matthews), Trent (J Botha), Wales (J Steward), West Midlands (G M Lawrence). We thank Michel Coleman, Tim Devis, Karen Dunnell, and John Fox at the Office for National Statistics for advice on drafts of this paper.
© Crown copyright.
Contributors: MQ and EA had the original idea for the study and together with PB and JJ collated and checked all the data. The paper was written jointly by all four authors. All the directors of the cancer registries in England contributed data, and some commented on drafts of the paper. MQ is the guarantor.
Competing interests: None declared.
* The coverage of the NHS cervical screening programme has increased greatly but several problems
* Rates of in situ cervical cancer have continued to rise in women aged 20-29
* Improvements in the screening programme have led to a 35% fall in incidence of invasive disease
* Reductions in mortality over the past 40 years in women aged over 54 are not related to screening, but in
women under 55 screening may have prevented 800 deaths in 1997
1 Farmery E, Gray JAM. Report of the first five years of the NHS cervical screening programme. Oxford: National Coordinating Network, 1994.
2 Department of Health and Social Security. Health services management: cervical cancer screening. Heywood: DHSS, 1988. (Health circular HC(88)1.)
3 National Audit Office. The performance of the NHS cervical screening programme in England. Report by the comptroller and auditor general. London: Stationery Office, 1998.
4 Department of Health. General practice in the NHS: a new contract. London: DoH, 1989.
5 Department of Health. Cervical screening programme, England: 1994-95 to 1996-97. London: DoH, 1996-97. (Statistical bulletins 1996/3, 1996/26, 1997/27.)
6 Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. Cancer statistics--registrations, England and Wales, 1971 to 1992. London: HMSO, 1979-98. (Series MB1 Nos 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10-16, 18-25.)
7 Huggett C. Review of the quality and comparability of data held by regional cancer registries. Bristol: Bristol Cancer Epidemiology Unit, 1995.
8 Quinn MJ, Allen E, on behalf of the United Kingdom Association of Cancer Registries. Changes in incidence of and mortality from breast cancer in England and Wales since introduction of screening. BMJ 1995;311:1391-5.
9 Estève J, Benhamou E, Raymond L. Descriptive epidemiology. Statistical methods in cancer research. Vol IV. Lyons: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1994. (IARC scientific publication No 128.)
10 Roberts A. Cervical cytology in England and Wales, 1965-80. Health Trends 1982;14:41-2.
11 Department of Health and Social Security. Cervical cytology 1980 to 1987-88. Summary information from form SBH140, England. London: DHSS, 1981-88.
12 Department of Health. Cervical cytology, 1988-89 to 1993-94. Summary information from Form KC53, England. London: DoH, 1989-94.
13 Osmond C, Gardner MJ, Acheson ED. Analysis of trends in cancer mortality in England and Wales during 1951-80 separating changes associated with period of birth and period of death. BMJ 1982;284:1005-8.
14 Sasieni P, Cuzick J, Farmery E. Accelerated decline in cervical cancer mortality in England and Wales. Lancet 1995;346:1566-7.
15 Wilson JMG, Jungner G. Principles and practice of screening for disease. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 1968. (WHO public health paper 34.)
16 Day NE. Screening for cancer of the cervix. J Epidemiol Comm Health 1989;43:103-6.
17 Raffle AE, Alden B, Mackenzie EFD. Detection rates for abnormal cervical smears: what are we screening for? Lancet 1995;345:1469-73.
18 Johnson J. Media focus on failures of screening programme. BMJ 1997;314:1630.
19 Moss S. Screening for cancer of the cervix. In: Chamberlain J, Moss S, eds. Evaluation of cancer screening. London: Springer, 1996:15-32.
20 Miller AB, Chamberlain J, Day NE, Hakama M, Prorok PC. Report on a workshop of the UICC project on evaluation of screening for cancer. Int J Cancer 1990;46:761-9.
21 Van Wijngaarden WJ, Duncan ID. Rationale for stopping cervical screening in women over 50. BMJ 1993;306:967-71.
22 Chamberlain J. Screening for early detection of cancer. In: Tiffany R, Pritchard AP, eds. Oncology for nurses and health care professionals. Vol 1. London: Harper and Row, 1988:155-73.
23 Cook GA, Draper GJ. Trends in cervical cancer and carcinoma in situ in Great Britain. Br J Cancer 1984;50:367-75.
24 Parkin DM, Nguyen-Dinh X, Day NE. The impact of screening on the incidence of cervical cancer in England and Wales. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;92:150-7.
25 Murphy MFG, Campbell MJ, Goldblatt PO. Twenty years' screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in Great Britain 1964-84: further evidence for its ineffectiveness. J Epidemiol Comm Health 1987;42:49-53.
26 Austoker J. Screening for cervical cancer. BMJ 1994;309:241-7.
27 Lancaster G, Moran T, Woodman C. Towards achieving the health of the nation target for cervical cancer: accuracy of cancer registration. J Pub Health Med 1992;16:50-2.
28 Coleman MP, Estève J, Damiecki P, Arslan A, Renard H. Trends in cancer incidence and mortality. Lyons: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1993. (IARC scientific publications No 121.)
29 Herbert A, Breen C, Bryant TN, Hitchcock A, Macdonald H, Millward-Sadler GH, et al. Invasive cervical cancer in Southampton and south west Hampshire: effect of introducing a comprehensive screening programme. J Med Screening 1996;3:23-8.
30 Sasieni PD, Cuzick J, Lynch-Farmery E and the National Coordinating Network for Cervical Screening Working Group. Estimating the efficacy of screening by auditing smear histories of women with and without cervical cancer. Br J Cancer 1996;73:1001-5.
31 Raffle AE. Deaths from cervical cancer began falling before screening programmes were established. BMJ 1997;315:953-4.
- This Week In The BMJ Published: 03 April 1999; BMJ 318 doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7188.0d
- Editor's Choice Published: 03 April 1999; BMJ 318 doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7188.0
- ResearchInequalities in reported use of breast and cervical screening in Great Britain: analysis of cross sectional survey dataPublished: 16 June 2009; BMJ 338 doi:10.1136/bmj.b2025
- Analysis Published: 23 August 2007; BMJ 335 doi:10.1136/bmj.39273.458322.BE
- Letter Published: 04 September 1999; BMJ 319 doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7210.642
- Doctors in Pakistan call for workers deported from the UAE to be screened for HIVBMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6544; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6544
- Time for guidelines on safety netting?BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6411; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6411
- The BMJ Christmas appeal 2016-7: Orbis, the sight saversBMJ December 01, 2016, 355 i6425; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6425
- Association between screening and the thyroid cancer “epidemic” in South Korea: evidence from a nationwide studyBMJ November 30, 2016, 355 i5745; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5745
- Overdiagnosis of thyroid cancerBMJ November 30, 2016, 355 i6312; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6312
- Comparative fertility and pregnancy outcomes after local treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and stage 1a1 cervical cancer: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis from the CIRCLE group
- Could changing invitation and booking processes help women translate their cervical screening intentions into action? A population-based survey of womens preferences in Great Britain
- Health economic evaluation of a serum-based blood test for brain tumour diagnosis: exploration of two clinical scenarios
- Community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus Papanicolaou cytology
- Results of Further Diagnostic Procedures Among Patients with Cytological Characteristics of Minor Changes on Pap Smears
- Fertility and early pregnancy outcomes after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: systematic review and meta-analysis
- A Population-Based Evaluation of Cervical Screening in the United States: 2008-2011
- Cervical cancer screening among vulnerable women: Factors affecting guideline adherence at a community health centre in Toronto, Ont
- Evidence-based clinical guidelines for immigrants and refugees
- Cervical Cone Measurements and Residual Disease in LLETZ Conisation for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
- Inequalities in reported use of breast and cervical screening in Great Britain: analysis of cross sectional survey data
- Decreasing Cervical Cancer Mortality in Mexico: Effect of Papanicolaou Coverage, Birthrate, and the Importance of Diagnostic Validity of Cytology
- Challenges of implementing human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination policy
- Commentary: Health inequity could increase in poor countries if universal HPV vaccination is not adopted
- Imaging of cervical cancer
- A systematic review of postcoital bleeding and risk of cervical cancer
- Trends in Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma Incidence in 13 European Countries: Changing Risk and the Effects of Screening
- Cervical screening
- Analysis of Aberrant DNA Methylation and Human Papillomavirus DNA in Cervicovaginal Specimens to Detect Invasive Cervical Cancer and Its Precursors
- Cervical cancer mortality by neighbourhood income in urban Canada from 1971 to 1996
- Randomised controlled trial of the effect of evidence based information on women's willingness to participate in cervical cancer screening
- Cervical screening and health inequality in England in the 1990s
- Outcomes of screening to prevent cancer: analysis of cumulative incidence of cervical abnormality and modelling of cases and deaths prevented
- Cancer screening
- Primary screening for high risk HPV by home obtained cervicovaginal lavage is an alternative screening tool for unscreened women
- Making the most of Pap tests
- Cervical cancer: the increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma in younger women
- Cervical cytology smears in sexually transmitted infection clinics in the United Kingdom
- Screening and mortality from cervical cancer
- Pleasing both authors and readers