Meta-analyses of observational data should be done with due care
BMJ 1999; 318 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7175.56 (Published 02 January 1999) Cite this as: BMJ 1999;318:56
- George Davey Smith, Professor of clinical epidemiology,
- Matthias Egger, Senior lecturer in epidemiology
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR
EDITOR—In our review of meta-analyses of observational studies we pointed out that all these are susceptible to all the biases inherent in observational research1 and that it is easy to generate seemingly plausible explanations for findings of observational studies that are in fact spurious.2Birkett's critique of one of our examples illustrates these points.3
Relation between dietary calcium and systolic blood pressure by method of dietary assessment. Erroneous data published by Cappuccio et al4 (panel A) and corrected analyses by Birkett3 (panel B). Slopes with 95% …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £184 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£50 / $60/ €56 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.