Counting the dead in China
BMJ 1998; 317 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7170.1399 (Published 21 November 1998) Cite this as: BMJ 1998;317:1399
All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
Lopez expresses surprise in his editorial that tobacco causes less
deaths from vascular disease in China than in western countries.[1] Yet
this is to be expected because China has a lower level of milk consumption
and a lower prevalence of adult lactose absorbers,[2] which are similarly
associated with lower mortality from ischaemic heart disease (IHD) in
other populations than can be expected from tobacco and other conventional
risk factors: Japanese, some Polynesians and Melanesians, South African
Blacks, Mediterranean Europeans, Afro-Caribbeans in
Britain, and Greenland Eskimos.[3,4] These two global clues on a possible
protection from IHD (i.e. reducing intake of lactose) have not been
followed up by cardiovascular epidemiologists and scientists. WHO should
therefore accept the responsibility to institute appropriate
investigations on this hypothesis.
1. Lopez AD. Counting the dead in China. BMJ 1998;317:1399-40.
2. Segall JJ. Hypothesis: Is lactose a dietary risk factor for ischaemic
heart disease? Int J Epidemiol 1980;9:271-76.
3. Segall JJ. Dietary lactose as a possible risk factor for
ischaemic heart disease: review of epidemiology. Int J Cardiol 1994;46:197
-207.
4. Segall JJ. Epidemiological evidence for the link between
dietary lactose and atherosclerosis (chapter 10). In: Colaco CALS, ed. The
glycation hypothesis of atherosclerosis. Austin, TX: Landes Bioscience,
1997.
JEFFREY J. SEGALL MBBS, MRCP 24 NOVEMBER 1998
General practitioner (Retired)
308 Cricklewood Lane
London NW2 2PX, UK
Tel/Fax: 0181-455 5005
Competing interests: No competing interests
Anti-smokers lie about health risks of smoking
Billing studies such as these as an investigation of smoking deaths
is deliberate scientific fraud and deceit of the public. By merely
comparing death rates of smokers versus non-smokers, you are purposely
confounding smoking with socioeconomic factors, in order to falsely blame
smoking for diseases that it does not cause.
This includes those vaunted tuberculosis deaths, and also all those
supposed "smoking related diseases" we now know are really caused by
bacteria and viruses, such as Helicobacter pylori, Chlamydia pneumoniae,
Chlamydia trachomatis, and human papillomavirus.
Trash like this is living proof that it's you anti-smokers who lie to
us about the health risks of smoking, not the tobacco companies. And all
those incompetent cowards do is sit there cowering.
And what about all you doctors? Are you all stupid, or else corrupt?
Or are the anti-smoking racketeers threatening you if you speak up with
the truth?
Finally, just because you can put over this garbage on your mentally
retarded press toadies, don't assume that you are impressing us smokers
with it.
Competing interests: No competing interests