Oxygen at high altitude
BMJ 1998; 317 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7165.1063 (Published 17 October 1998) Cite this as: BMJ 1998;317:1063All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
Dear Sir
I have just come across Andrew J Peacock's summary of the effects of
high altitude ("Oxygen at high altitude": BMJ 317: 1063-1066, 1998). One
comment made is that "at altitude hypoxia does increase ventilation, but
usually only when the inspired oxygen pressure is reduced to about 13.3
kPa (3000m altitude)."
As a physiologist living in Johannesburg (ca 1700m altitude) I should
like to suggest that this comment perpetuates a misconception. The
average person living in Johannesburg, where atmospheric PO2 is 17 kPa,
has a PaO2 of 11 kPa (85mmHg) and a PaCO2 of 4.5 kPa(35mmHg). If CO2 is
the main stimulus to ventilation how can PaCO2 be 35mmHg in Johannesburg
but 40mmHg at sea-level? Our conclusion is
that hypoxic drive begins at altitudes far lower and at atmospheric PO2
far higher than those suggested by laboratory experiments. The PaCO2 in
Johannesburg is a reflection of this effect: PaCO2 is inversely related to
alveolar ventilation. Further support for our conclusion, if it is
correct, is that an adjustment to plasma pH
regulation should be a consequence. This is indeed the case: the average
Johannesburger has a plasma HCO3- concentration of 21 mmol/ which is
significantly lower than its concentration at sea-level, but a
concentration completely appropriate if plasma pH is to be 7.4,
which it is.
Thus our physiological data suggest that at quite low altitudes
hypoxia causes an increase in alveolar ventilation (at least in people who
live at these relatively low altitudes) and a consequential reduction in
PaCO2. To compensate for the lower PaCO2, plasma HCO3-concentrations are
adjusted downwards by the usual mechanisms.
As an aside in one of Dr Peacock's diagrams (p 1064) there is a
suggestion that at 1500m altitude impaired night vision occurs. I am not
aware that this is a problem here.
Yours faithfully
G Mitchell
PROFESSOR
HEAD: DEPARTMENT OF PHYSIOLOGY
Wits Medical School
Competing interests: No competing interests
EDITOR--The risks of travelling to high altitude regions vary
significantly by the degree of remoteness and mean elevation (moderate
high altitude 2500 – 3500 m, very high altitude 3500 – 5500 m, and extreme
altitude >5500 m). The
recommendations Peacock offers pertaining to the cardiac disease risks at
altitude do not take these important factors into consideration.(1)
Peacock states that the evidence as far as heart disease is concerned
is encouraging, but in doing so ignores the limitations of the existing
studies. There is limited data from moderate altitude in Europe and North
America, but
caution should be used when extrapolating these data to very high and
extreme altitudes where the physiology differs. There are several
anecdotal accounts and two published case reports that call attention to
episodes of acute myocardial infarction and sudden death at very high and
extreme altitude.(2,3)
One should not interpret the limited number of reports as evidence
that travel to altitude with heart disease is without significant risk.
High altitude exposure commonly involves remote and less developed regions
of the world. This is especially true for very high and extreme altitude
regions. For the few physicians practicing in these remote areas, it is
extremely difficult to document a case series of cardiac events or
quantify risks. Confirmatory tests are not typically available.
Evacuations are often urgently conducted. Follow-up and outcome data are
unfortunately lost to frequent facility transfers, language barriers,
unavailability of autopsy, and repatriation. The lack of reports may
reflect these circumstances, rather than an absence of clinical cases or
morbidity.
Our experience at very high and extreme altitudes over several years
at Kunde Hospital (3860 m) in the Mt. Everest Region of Nepal, the
Himalayan Rescue Association Aid Posts in Manang (3535 m) and Pheriche
(4243 m), Nepal, and on
several climbing expeditions (up to 8848 m) suggests concern for
travellers with heart disease to remote high altitude areas. We suspect
that there may be an increased risk of sudden death and significant
deterioration in cardiac symptoms at very high and extreme altitude. For
example, during the 6 week peak visitation period this autumn in the
Khumbu region of Nepal, nearly 8,000 visitors entered the high altitude
national park. Within this group there was
one sudden death from suspected myocardial infarction, one sudden death
from suspected pulmonary embolism, three evacuations for acute chest pain
syndrome, one suspected subarachnoid bleed requiring manual ventilation,
and numerous patients treated for moderate and severe altitude sickness.
As the number of older and less healthy trekkers with chronic disease
continues to increase, one might reasonably expect additional cases.
Advice to patients with cardiovascular disease considering travel to
high altitude, even if stable, should include a discussion to determine
the remoteness and altitude of the area to be visited. Any additional
risks due to absence of medical facilities should be communicated.
Patients should also be informed that although moderate high altitude may
not increase risks, any added risks that exposure to very high or extreme
altitude might contribute is at best unknown as there is a conspicuous
void of data in the medical literature.
James A. Litch Codirector and Physician
Rachel A. Bishop Codirector and Physician
Kunde Hospital
Solukhumbu District
PO Box 224
Kathmandu, Nepal
No conflict of interests
1 Peacock AJ. ABC of oxygen. Oxygen at high altitude. BMJ
1998;317:1063-6. (17 October.)
2 Hutchison S, Litch JA. Acute myocardial infarction at high altitude.
JAMA 1997;278:1661-2.
3 Litch JA, Basnyat B, Zimmerman M. Subarachnoid hemorrhage at high
altitude. West J Med 1997;167:180-1.
Competing interests: No competing interests
Ibuprofen and AMS
The article reccommends Paracetomal as a treatment for the onset of
AMS symptoms. Does Ibuprofen work as well/better?
Any suggestions please.
Competing interests: No competing interests