Editorials
All changed, changed utterly
BMJ 1998; 316 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7149.1917 (Published 27 June 1998) Cite this as: BMJ 1998;316:1917Related articles
- Editor's Choice Published: 27 June 1998; BMJ 316 doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7149.0
- News Published: 27 June 1998; BMJ 316 doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7149.1924a
- Letter Published: 27 June 1998; BMJ 316 doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7149.1986
- Letter Published: 07 April 2015; BMJ 350 doi:10.1136/bmj.h1784
- Editor's Choice Published: 06 June 2024; BMJ 385 doi:10.1136/bmj.q1235
See more
- Distilling ethics, compassion, science and the art of medicineBMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6510; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6510
- Industry sponsorship—what do patients think?BMJ November 16, 2016, 355 i6010; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6010
- Can safety-netting improve cancer detection in patients with vague symptoms?BMJ November 09, 2016, 355 i5515; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5515
- Patient satisfaction with GPs is not related to consultation length, study findsBMJ October 28, 2016, 355 i5744; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5744
- Rise of the machinesBMJ October 27, 2016, 355 i5777; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5777
Cited by...
- Infected blood scandal: British medicines worst moment
- Confessions of a CQC inspector
- Culture, compassion and clinical neglect: probity in the NHS after Mid Staffordshire
- Openness and honesty in gaining fully informed consent will benefit both patients and doctors
- Should trainees be the 'eyes and the ears' of both good and bad practice in hospitals?
- Regulation in a changing healthcare landscape: the role of the General Medical Council
- The year of Francis
- Simulated Hip Arthroscopy Skills: Learning Curves with the Lateral and Supine Patient Positions: A Randomized Trial
- Identifying orthopaedic surgeons of the future: The inability of some medical students to achieve competence in basic arthroscopic tasks despite training: a randomised study
- Changes in the quality of doctor-patient communication between 1982 and 2001: an observational study on hypertension care as perceived by patients and general practitioners
- Revalidation: a General Medical Council perspective
- Surgical "league tables"
- Professionalism -- connecting the past and the present and a blueprint for the Canadian Association of General Surgeons
- Training in the operating theatre: is it safe?
- Practical virtue ethics: healthcare whistleblowing and portable digital technology
- Continuing professional development for psychiatrists: CPD and regulation
- Is there a moral duty for doctors to trust patients?
- A very public failure: lessons for quality improvement in healthcare organisations from the Bristol Royal Infirmary
- Complexity science: Coping with complexity: educating for capability
- One Bristol, but there could have been many
- Towards a National System for Monitoring the Quality of Hospital-Based Stroke Services
- Professionally led regulation in medicine
- Bioethics for clinicians: 23. Disclosure of medical error
- Clinical governance in primary care: Accountability for clinical governance: developing collective responsibility for quality in primary care
- Professionalism and Medicine's Social Contract
- Organisational culture and quality of health care
- The GMC: where now?
- Public disclosure of performance data: learning from the US experience
- Managing the clinical performance of doctors
- Towards a feasible model for shared decision making: focus group study with general practice registrars
- Assessing operative skill
- A model for clinical governance in primary care groups
- Regulation of doctors and the Bristol inquiry
- The aftermath of the Bristol case