Qualitative research and evidence based medicineBMJ 1998; 316 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7139.1230 (Published 18 April 1998) Cite this as: BMJ 1998;316:1230
- Judith Green (email@example.com), lecturer in sociologya,
- Nicky Britten, senior lecturer in medical sociologyb
- a Health Services Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT
- b Department of General Practice, United Medical and Dental School of Guy's and St Thomas's Hospitals, London SE11 6SP
- Correspondence to: Dr Green
- Accepted 21 November 1997
Qualitative research may seem unscientific and anecdotal to many medical scientists. However, as the critics of evidence based medicine are quick to point out, medicine itself is more than the application of scientific rules.1 Clinical experience, based on personal observation, reflection, and judgment, is also needed to translate scientific results into treatment of individual patients.2 Personal experience is often characterised as being anecdotal, ungeneralisable, and a poor basis for making scientific decisions. However, it is often a more powerful persuader than scientific publication in changing clinical practice,3-5 as illustrated by the occasional series “A patient who changed my practice” in the BMJ.6
In an attempt to widen the scope of evidence based medicine, recent workshops have included units on other subjects, including economic analysis and qualitative research.7 However, to do so is to move beyond the discipline of clinical epidemiology that underpins evidence based medicine. Qualitative research, in particular, addresses research questions that are different from those considered by clinical epidemiology. Qualitative research can investigate practitioners' and patients' attitudes, beliefs, and preferences, and the whole question of how evidence is turned into practice. The value of qualitative methods lies in their ability to pursue systematically the kinds of research questions that are not easily answerable by experimental methods.
We use the example of asthma treatment to illustrate how qualitative methods can broaden the scope of evidence based medicine. Although there is consensus over evidence based practice in the treatment of asthma,8 questions remain about general practitioners' use of clinical guidelines and patients' use of prescribed medication.9
Qualitative methods can help bridge the gap between scientific evidence and clinical practice …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.