Quantitive systematic review of topically applied non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
BMJ 1998; 316 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7128.333 (Published 31 January 1998) Cite this as: BMJ 1998;316:333
- R A Moore (andrew.moore{at}pru.ox.ac.uk), consultant biochemista,
- M R Tramèr, research fellowa,
- D Carroll, senior research nursea,
- P J Wiffen, regional pharmaceutical advisera,
- H J McQuay, clinical reader in pain reliefa
- a Pain Research and Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, University of Oxford, The Churchill, Oxford Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LJ
- Correspondence to: Dr Moore
- Accepted 30 June 1997
Abstract
Objective: To review the effectiveness and safety of topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in acute and chronic pain conditions.
Design: Quantitive systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
Data sources: 86 trials involving 10 160 patients.
Main outcome measures: Measures of treatment success approximating at least 50% reduction in pain, local and systemic adverse effects. Analysis at 1 week for acute and 2 weeks for chronic conditions with relative benefit and number needed to treat.
Results: In acute pain conditions (soft tissue trauma, strains, and sprains) placebo controlled trials had a relative benefit of 1.7 (1.5 to 1.9), the number needed to treat was 3.9 (3.4 to 4.4). With analysis by drug (at least three trials), ketoprofen (number needed to treat 2.6), felbinac (3.0), ibuprofen (3.5), and piroxicam (4.2) had significant efficacy. Benzydamine and indomethacin were no different from placebo. In chronic pain conditions (osteoarthritis, tendinitis) placebo controlled trials had a relative benefit of 2.0 (1.5 to 2.7); the number needed to treat was 3.1 (2.7 to 3.8). Small trials (<40 treated patients) exaggerated effectiveness of topical non-steroidals by 33% in acute conditions but not in chronic conditions. There was no relation between trial quality and treatment effect. In both acute and chronic pain local and systemic adverse events and withdrawal from the study related to the drug had a low incidence and were no different from placebo.
Conclusion: Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are effective in relieving pain in acute and chronic conditions.
Key messages
Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are widely thought to be ineffective, despite licensed status
To evaluate their effectiveness and safety we conducted a quantitive systematic review of all relevant randomised trials
In acute conditions like strains and sprains topical non-steroidals were significantly better than placebo over 1 week with a number needed to treat of 3.9 (3.4 to 4.4). For drugs with at least three placebo controlled trials ketoprofen (number needed to treat 2.6), felbinac (3.0), ibuprofen (3.5), and piroxicam (4.2) had significant efficacy
In chronic conditions like arthritis and rheumatism topical non-steroidals were significantly better than placebo over 2 weeks with a number needed to treat of 3.1 (2.7 to 3.8)
In both acute and chronic pain local and systemic adverse events and withdrawal related to tested drug had a low incidence and were no different from placebo
Footnotes
- Accepted 30 June 1997