Intended for healthcare professionals


Patients' assessments of disability in multiple sclerosis

BMJ 1997; 315 doi: (Published 15 November 1997) Cite this as: BMJ 1997;315:1305

Most patients have difficulty in rating themselves on visual analogue scales

  1. Caroline E Selai, Research psychologista,
  2. Michael R Trimble, Professor in behavioural neurologya
  1. a Institute of Neurology, London WCIN 3BQ
  2. b Neurosciences Trial Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU
  3. c Department of Neurology, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE

    Editor—The recent finding that patients' self assessments on a visual analogue scale did not correlate with other measures of disability in multiple sclerosis comes as no surprise to us.1 Visual analogue scales, which are used widely in studies of health status and quality of life, ask patients to rate themselves on a calibrated scale, usually from 0 to 100. The language of the end points or anchors of the scale varies, but, usually, 100 represents best possible health or quality of life and 0 represents the worst possible health or quality of life. In our experience, of several hundred interviews with patients with neurological disorders (epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, Gilles …

    View Full Text

    Log in

    Log in through your institution


    * For online subscription