Editorials Peer review: reform or revolution? BMJ 1997; 315 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7111.759 (Published 27 September 1997) Cite this as: BMJ 1997;315:759 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Editor's Choice The stories behind the headlines Published: 27 September 1997; BMJ 315 doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7111.0 See more Constitutional symptoms in a young person BMJ December 07, 2016, 355 i5781; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5781 The BMJ Christmas appeal 2016-7: Orbis, the sight savers BMJ December 01, 2016, 355 i6425; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6425 EU to launch new antimicrobial resistance action plan BMJ November 23, 2016, 355 i6328; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6328 A typical sign on a plain knee radiograph BMJ November 23, 2016, 355 i6021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6021 An older man with thoracic back pain BMJ November 23, 2016, 355 i5786; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5786 Cited by... Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A surveyAbstract Fulltext PDF Through a glass darkly: The present and the future of editorial peer reviewAbstract Fulltext PDF Measuring the social impact of researchAbstract Fulltext PDF Netprints: the next phase in the evolution of biomedical publishingAbstract Fulltext PDF Electronic preprints can be categorisedAbstract Fulltext PDF What makes a good reviewer of manuscripts?Abstract Fulltext PDF
