Personal Views The private life of systematic reviews BMJ 1997; 315 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.686a (Published 13 September 1997) Cite this as: BMJ 1997;315:686 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Editorial Meta-analysis and the meta-epidemiology of clinical research Published: 13 September 1997; BMJ 315 doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.617 See more GP who referred to complaint from colleague as “a vindictive pile of female crap” is struck off BMJ January 18, 2022, 376 o136; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o136 We must keep recognising the extraordinary efforts of NHS staff BMJ January 18, 2022, 376 o140; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o140 Peter Campion BMJ January 18, 2022, 376 o94; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o94 Madan R Bahl BMJ January 18, 2022, 376 o81; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o81 John Gwynfor Evans BMJ January 18, 2022, 376 o84; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o84 Cited by... Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 2. Best available evidence: how low should you go?Abstract Fulltext PDF Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 1. Finding the evidence: how far should you go?Abstract Fulltext PDF Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authorsAbstract Fulltext PDF
