Personal Views The private life of systematic reviews BMJ 1997; 315 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.686a (Published 13 September 1997) Cite this as: BMJ 1997;315:686 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Editorial Meta-analysis and the meta-epidemiology of clinical research Published: 13 September 1997; BMJ 315 doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.617 See more When I use a word . . . . The Lelamour Herbal BMJ January 27, 2023, 380 p225; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p225 A bill before parliament for the right to breath clean air BMJ January 27, 2023, 380 p224; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p224 “Functional disorders”: one of medicine’s biggest failures BMJ January 27, 2023, 380 p221; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p221 Medical academic workforce is under threat without urgent action on pay and pensions, say peers BMJ January 27, 2023, 380 p220; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p220 Maternity care: Entonox is withdrawn from some hospitals because of risk to staff from high exposure BMJ January 27, 2023, 380 p212; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p212 Cited by... Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 2. Best available evidence: how low should you go?Abstract Fulltext PDF Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 1. Finding the evidence: how far should you go?Abstract Fulltext PDF Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authorsAbstract Fulltext PDF
