How to read a paper: The Medline databaseBMJ 1997; 315 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7101.180 (Published 19 July 1997) Cite this as: BMJ 1997;315:180
All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
To tackle problem 2:' You want to answer a specific question', you construct a focused (specific) search by combining two or more broad (sensistive) searches.
Following the steps describes in your paper I did not struck a single bull's eye on June 2nd 1998.
Next to reference 2 from your paper I struck: Grinspoon S, Herzog D, Klibanski A. Mechanisms and treatment options for bone loss in anorexia nervosa. Psychopharmacol Bull 1997;33(3):399-404.
This is a (narrative) review. So I would have struck a single "Bull" 's eye, if one aditional step: publication type = review, was suggested to narrow the search to the current best evidence.
Since eBMJ made it so easy to give some feedback or comment on published papers, and clames to have more place to present them, I quickly made this remark.
It might be of use in a more recent version of the paper.
Competing interests: No competing interests