Self monitoring of glucose by people with diabetes: evidence based practiceBMJ 1997; 314 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7085.964 (Published 29 March 1997) Cite this as: BMJ 1997;314:964
- Marilyn Gallichan, diabetes specialist nursea
- a East Cornwall Hospital Bodmin Cornwall PL31 2EN
- Accepted 21 November 1996
The inappropriate use of self monitoring of glucose is wasteful of NHS resources and can cause psychological harm. Although a few patients find that self monitoring enables them to understand and take control of their diabetes, many people with diabetes are performing inaccurate or unnecessary tests. There is no convincing evidence that self monitoring improves glycaemic control, nor that blood testing is necessarily better than urine testing. It may be appropriate for some patients not to monitor their own glucose but to rely instead on regular laboratory estimations of glycaemic control. Glucose self monitoring should be performed only when it serves an identified purpose.
It is widely assumed that glucose self monitoring, preferably of blood glucose concentrations, is desirable or even essential for everyone with diabetes. It is common for patients who have previously tested their urine, or have done no glucose monitoring at home, to be taught to measure their blood glucose when they are admitted to hospital. In the community too, patients are often encouraged to monitor their blood glucose, and newly diagnosed patients of all ages are usually taught to measure their blood glucose concentrations. Self monitoring can sometimes be useful, but evidence is mounting that its indiscriminate use is of questionable value. In 1995, £42.6 million was spent on home monitoring of glucose in the United Kingdom (Intercontinental Medical Statistics, personal communication). Is this enormous cost justified? Is blood testing necessarily better than urine testing? Is glucose self monitoring always necessary, or is it sometimes a waste of time and money? Are recommendations for self monitoring based on sound evidence?
We now have conclusive evidence that improved control of glycaemia is associated with a significantly lower risk of the complications of diabetes1, but there is no convincing evidence that glycaemic control is consistently influenced …