Intended for healthcare professionals

  1. Are research ethics...
  2. Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountability
Education And Debate

Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountability

BMJ 1996; 313 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7069.1390 (Published 30 November 1996) Cite this as: BMJ 1996;313:1390

Related articles

See more

Cited by...

  • The structure of ethics review: expert ethics committees and the challenge of voluntary research euthanasia
  • Randomised placebo-controlled trials of surgery: ethical analysis and guidelines
  • Improving access to medicines: empowering patients in the quest to improve treatment for rare lethal diseases
  • Bioethics: why philosophy is essential for progress
  • The pioneers of transparency
  • Health Research Authority's great leap forward on UK trial registration
  • 'Consent rituals' in evaluation of coercive care
  • Sample size determinations in original research protocols for randomised clinical trials submitted to UK research ethics committees: review
  • All trials must be registered and the results published
  • Poor Citation of Prior Evidence in Hip Fracture Trials
  • CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
  • Ethics in a scientific approach: the importance of the biostatistician in research ethics committees
  • Research ethics and lessons from Hwanggate: what can we learn from the Korean cloning fraud?
  • Waiving confidentiality for the greater good
  • Two deaths and two lessons: Is it time to review the structure and function of research ethics committees?
  • Ethics behind closed doors: do research ethics committees need secrecy?
  • When placebo controlled trials are essential and equivalence trials are inadequate
  • Meta-analysis of short term low dose prednisolone versus placebo and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis
  • Research ethics committees must ensure registration of research and accessibility of results
  • Meeting the challenges facing research ethics committees: some practical suggestions
  • meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies
  • Medical Editors Trial Amnesty (META)
  • Local research ethics committees
  • An amnesty for unpublished trials
  • Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
  • Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects
  • Does setting good practice standards for research ethics committees increase their legal liability?
  • Are research ethics committees behaving unethically?
Back to top