Education And Debate
Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountabilityBMJ 1996; 313 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7069.1390 (Published 30 November 1996) Cite this as: BMJ 1996;313:1390
- Analysis And Comment Published: 04 May 2006; BMJ 332 doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7549.1086
- Research Methods & ReportingCONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trialsPublished: 24 March 2010; BMJ 340 doi:10.1136/bmj.c869
- Editorial Published: 09 January 2013; BMJ 346 doi:10.1136/bmj.f105
- ResearchSample size determinations in original research protocols for randomised clinical trials submitted to UK research ethics committees: reviewPublished: 21 March 2013; BMJ 346 doi:10.1136/bmj.f1135
- Feature Published: 02 January 2015; BMJ 350 doi:10.1136/bmj.g7717
- Constitutional symptoms in a young personBMJ December 07, 2016, 355 i5781; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5781
- The BMJ Christmas appeal 2016-7: Orbis, the sight saversBMJ December 01, 2016, 355 i6425; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6425
- EU to launch new antimicrobial resistance action planBMJ November 23, 2016, 355 i6328; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6328
- A typical sign on a plain knee radiographBMJ November 23, 2016, 355 i6021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6021
- An older man with thoracic back painBMJ November 23, 2016, 355 i5786; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5786
- The structure of ethics review: expert ethics committees and the challenge of voluntary research euthanasia
- Randomised placebo-controlled trials of surgery: ethical analysis and guidelines
- Improving access to medicines: empowering patients in the quest to improve treatment for rare lethal diseases
- Bioethics: why philosophy is essential for progress
- The pioneers of transparency
- Health Research Authority's great leap forward on UK trial registration
- 'Consent rituals' in evaluation of coercive care
- Sample size determinations in original research protocols for randomised clinical trials submitted to UK research ethics committees: review
- All trials must be registered and the results published
- Poor Citation of Prior Evidence in Hip Fracture Trials
- CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
- Ethics in a scientific approach: the importance of the biostatistician in research ethics committees
- Research ethics and lessons from Hwanggate: what can we learn from the Korean cloning fraud?
- Waiving confidentiality for the greater good
- Two deaths and two lessons: Is it time to review the structure and function of research ethics committees?
- Ethics behind closed doors: do research ethics committees need secrecy?
- When placebo controlled trials are essential and equivalence trials are inadequate
- Meta-analysis of short term low dose prednisolone versus placebo and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis
- Research ethics committees must ensure registration of research and accessibility of results
- Meeting the challenges facing research ethics committees: some practical suggestions
- meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies
- Medical Editors Trial Amnesty (META)
- Local research ethics committees
- An amnesty for unpublished trials
- Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
- Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects
- Does setting good practice standards for research ethics committees increase their legal liability?
- Are research ethics committees behaving unethically?