Intended for healthcare professionals

General Practice

Commentary: an opposing view from the Netherlands

BMJ 1996; 313 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7059.734 (Published 21 September 1996) Cite this as: BMJ 1996;313:734
  1. Machiel P Springer, professor of general practicea,
  2. Harm W J van Marwijk, lecturer in general practicea
  1. a Department of Primary Care, University of Leiden, PO 2008, 2301 CB Leiden, Netherlands

    Dutch general practitioners receive similar excessive amounts of mail and are as overworked as their British colleagues—we like to think more so. But we are much more willing to answer questionnaires from our colleagues. Why should this be? Are we nicer, more obsessional, more anxious to express an option? Are we more supportive of research in general practice? Do we get paid for responding?

    The most important factors that determine the response rate to a questionnaire in any country are its subject, length, and quality, together with the “face” it presents. The Midlands study referred to by McAvoy and Kaner dealt with sensitive or perhaps even irritating subjects: general practitioners' attitudes to …

    View Full Text