Opening Pandora's box: the unpredictability of reassurance by a normal test resultBMJ 1996; 313 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7053.329 (Published 10 August 1996) Cite this as: BMJ 1996;313:329
- I G McDonald, director, Centre for the Study of Clinical Practicea,
- J Daly, senior lecturerb,
- V M Jelinek, senior cardiologista,
- F Panetta, cardiologistc,
- J M Gutman, cardiologista
- a St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Melbourne, Victoria 3065, Australia
- b School of Sociology and Anthropology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Melbourne, Victoria 3065
- c Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Melbourne, Victoria 3181
- Correspondence to: Dr McDonald.
- Accepted 24 May 1996
Objectives: To determine the rate of failure of patient reassurance after a normal test result and study the determinants of failure.
Design: Replicated single case study with qualitative and quantitative data analysis.
Setting: University teaching hospital.
Subjects: 40 consecutive patients referred for echocardiography either because of symptoms (10 patients) or because of a heart murmur (30). 39 were shown to have a normal heart.
Interventions: Medical consultations and semistructured patient interviews were tape recorded. Structured interviews with consultant cardiologists were recorded in survey form.
Main outcome measures: Patient recall of the explanation and residual understanding, doubt, and anxiety about the heart after the test and post-test consultation.
Results: All 10 patients presenting with symptoms were left with anxiety about the heart despite a normal test result and reassurance by the consultant. Of 28 patients referred because of a murmur but shown to have no heart abnormality, 20 became anxious after detection of the murmur; 11 had residual anxiety despite the normal test result.
Conclusions: Reassurance of the “worried well”—anxious patients with symptoms or patients concerned by a health query resulting from a routine medical examination or from screening—constitutes a large part of medical practice. It seems to be widely assumed that explaining that tests have shown no abnormality is enough to reassure. The results of this study refute this and emphasise the importance of personal and social factors as obstacles to reassurance.
Obstacles to reassurance relate not only to prob- lems of doctor-patient communication but also to the patient's past experience and social circum- stances
Because of the risk of residual anxiety and the epidemiological hazard of a false positive or incon- clusive test result, referral for the test should be avoided if an expert clinical opinion will suffice
Clinical skills in recognising anxiety and identifying innocent murmurs should be rein- forced to minimise unnecessary referrals
The consequences of possible residual doubt and anxiety must be factored into measurements of cost effectiveness of echocardiography and of other imaging technologies
Funding Research and Development Grants Advisory Committee, Commonwealth Department of Human Services and Health.
Conflict of interest None.
- Accepted 24 May 1996