Intended for healthcare professionals

  1. Why we need...
  2. Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care
Education And Debate

Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care

BMJ 1996; 312 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7040.1215 (Published 11 May 1996) Cite this as: BMJ 1996;312:1215

Related articles

See more

Cited by...

  • The relationship between hyperglycaemia on admission and patient outcome is modified by hyperlactatemia and diabetic status: a retrospective analysis of the eICU collaborative research database
  • A Note on the Effects of Digital Primary Health Care on Utilization: Concepts, Evidence, and Descriptive Analysis of Non-Experimental Register Data from Sweden
  • A Comparative Safety Analysis of Medicines Based on the UK Pharmacovigilance and General Practice Prescribing Data in England
  • External control arm analysis: an evaluation of propensity score approaches, G-computation, and doubly debiased machine learning
  • Using aggregate patient data at the bedside via an on-demand consultation service
  • Effectiveness of hospital clowns for symptom management in paediatrics: systematic review of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials
  • Use of interrupted time series methods in the evaluation of health system quality improvement interventions: a methodological systematic review
  • What are the requirements for developing a successful national registry of auditory implants? A qualitative study
  • Interrupted versus continuous suturing for vesicourethral anastomosis during radical prostatectomy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Mendelian randomisation in cardiovascular research: an introduction for clinicians
  • Total Center Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Volume and 30-Day Mortality: A Contemporary National Cohort Study of 427 467 Elective, Urgent, and Emergency Cases
  • Surgical versus conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective cohort study
  • Palliative care for chronic illness: driving change
  • ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
  • The Ethics of Targeted Oncological Trials
  • Specialised teams or personal continuity across inpatient and outpatient mental healthcare? Study protocol for a natural experiment
  • Preventive Effects of Long-Term Supplementation with 2 Nutritious Food Supplements in Young Children in Niger
  • Prospective Cohort Study of Hospital Palliative Care Teams for Inpatients With Advanced Cancer: Earlier Consultation Is Associated With Larger Cost-Saving Effect
  • Reality of evidence-based practice in palliative care
  • Development of an algorithm to provide awareness in choosing study designs for inclusion in systematic reviews of healthcare interventions: a method study
  • Which factors may determine the necessary and feasible type of effectiveness evidence? A mixed methods approach to develop an instrument to help coverage decision-makers
  • Alignment of systematic reviews published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Database of Abstracts and Reviews of Effectiveness with global burden-of-disease data: a bibliographic analysis
  • Current Status and Future of Cannabis Research
  • A population-based observational study on the factors associated with the completion of palliative chemotherapy among patients with oesophagogastric cancer
  • Regression discontinuity designs: an approach to the evaluation of treatment efficacy in primary care using observational data
  • A 'Green Button' For Using Aggregate Patient Data At The Point Of Care
  • Reply to Ankarfeldt
  • Long-term benefits and adverse effects of intermittent versus daily glucocorticoids in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy
  • The feasibility of performing a randomisedcontrolled trial for femoroacetabular impingement surgery
  • Effectiveness of PhysioDirect telephone assessment and advice services for patients with musculoskeletal problems: pragmatic randomised controlled trial
  • Not-So-Random Errors: Randomized Controlled Trials Are Not the Only Evidence of the Value of PET
  • Reply: Not-So-Random Errors: Randomized Controlled Trials Are Not the Only Evidence of the Value of PET
  • To RCT or not to RCT: deciding when 'more evidence is needed' for public health policy and practice
  • Hospital service reconfiguration: the battle for hearts and minds
  • Observational BALANCE
  • Alternatives to randomisation in the evaluation of public health interventions: design challenges and solutions
  • The Necessity and Challenge of International Midwifery Science
  • Is the physician's adherence to prescription guidelines associated with the patient's socio-economic position? An analysis of statin prescription in South Sweden
  • Dental Practice Network of U.S. Dental Schools
  • Should the NHS strive to eradicate all unexplained variation? No
  • Applicability and generalisability of published results of randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies evaluating four orthopaedic procedures: methodological systematic review
  • A prospective, cohort study comparing translaminar screw fixation with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation for fusion of the degenerative lumbar spine
  • Hierarchy of Evidence: Where Observational Studies Fit in and Why We Need Them
  • MRI as an outcome in multiple sclerosis clinical trials
  • Use of primary care electronic medical record database in drug efficacy research on cardiovascular outcomes: comparison of database and randomised controlled trial findings
  • Evidence for the impact of quality improvement collaboratives: systematic review
  • Randomized Clinical Trials and Observational Studies: Guidelines for Assessing Respective Strengths and Limitations
  • Neurological care and risk of hospital mortality for patients with myasthenia gravis in England
  • Prognostic modelling in traumatic brain injury
  • Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
  • Estimated life expectancy of Parkinson's patients compared with the UK population
  • The efficacy of anti-TNF in rheumatoid arthritis, a comparison between randomised controlled trials and clinical practice
  • Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
  • Measurement of long-term outcomes in observational and randomised controlled trials
  • The design and assessment of prospective randomised, controlled trials in orthopaedic surgery
  • The New Millennium Palliative Care Project (2000-2003): the impact of specialised GP advisors
  • Bridging The Inferential Gap: The Electronic Health Record And Clinical Evidence
  • Some ethical considerations for the "off-label" use of drugs such as Avastin.
  • An evaluation of class effect
  • Interventions to improve management of anxiety disorders in general practice: a systematic review
  • Why stop at antidepressants?
  • The conventional wisdom and the activities of the middle range
  • EULAR evidence based recommendations for the management of hip osteoarthritis: report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT)
  • Evaluating neurorehabilitation: lessons from routine data collection
  • Reader's guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 1. Role and design
  • Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials
  • Making public health interventions more evidence based
  • Long term clinical outcome of home and hospital intravenous antibiotic treatment in adults with cystic fibrosis
  • Impact of regionalisation of cardiac surgery in Emilia-Romagna, Italy
  • Evaluating the health effects of social interventions
  • Cochrane Reviews: new blocks on the kids
  • Survival and effectiveness of leflunomide compared with methotrexate and sulfasalazine in rheumatoid arthritis: a matched observational study
  • The pharmacoepidemiology of COPD: Recent advances and methodological discussion
  • Methods for evaluation of small scale quality improvement projects
  • Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses
  • Overview of research designs
  • Systematic reviews and lifelong diseases
  • Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions
  • Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions
  • Evidence-Based Diabetes Care
  • A population perspective to evidence based medicine: ""evidence for population health""
  • Improving the delivery and organisation of mental health services: beyond the conventional randomised controlled trial
  • Using high quality clinical databases to complement the results of randomised controlled trials: the case of recombinant human activated protein C
  • More randomised controlled studies in speech and language therapy
  • Qualitative methods in psychiatric research
  • Safer discharge from intensive care to hospital wards
  • Specialization and cancer: words with too many meanings should be handled with care
  • The practice of clinical medicine as an art and as a science
  • Rationale for the use of non-invasive ventilation in chronic ventilatory failure
  • Psychotherapy for severe personality disorder
Back to top