Intended for healthcare professionals

  1. An evidence based...
  2. An evidence based approach to individualising treatment
Education And Debate

An evidence based approach to individualising treatment

BMJ 1995; 311 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7016.1356 (Published 18 November 1995) Cite this as: BMJ 1995;311:1356

Related articles

See more

Cited by...

  • Development and internal validation of prognostic models to predict negative health outcomes in older patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy in general practice
  • Personalized evidence based medicine: predictive approaches to heterogeneous treatment effects
  • Precision Prevention and Early Detection of Cancer: Fundamental Principles
  • A generalised model for individualising a treatment recommendation based on group-level evidence from randomised clinical trials
  • Estimating treatment effects for individual patients based on the results of randomised clinical trials
  • Population-Based Study of Competing Mortality in Head and Neck Cancer
  • Individual and Population Benefits of Daily Aspirin Therapy: A Proposal for Personalizing National Guidelines
  • Effect of whole body vibration on stereotypy of young children with autism
  • Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses
  • Interpreting research findings to guide treatment in practice
  • Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing latanoprost with brimonidine in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension or normal-tension glaucoma
  • Selecting Patients With Atrial Fibrillation for Anticoagulation: Stroke Risk Stratification in Patients Taking Aspirin
  • Assessing the benefit-harm balance at the bedside
  • Challenges for Evidence-Based Physical Therapy: Accessing and Interpreting High-Quality Evidence on Therapy
  • Benefits and harms associated with hormone replacement therapy: clinical decision analysis
  • Assessing the quality of research
  • About time: diagnostic guidelines that help clinicians
  • Number needed to treat (NNT): implication in rheumatology clinical practice
  • CARDIOVASCULAR AND CORONARY RISK ESTIMATION IN HYPERTENSION MANAGEMENT
  • Effects of stretching before and after exercising on muscle soreness and risk of injury: systematic review
  • Impact numbers in health policy decisions
  • Improving standards of medical and public health research
  • Population implications of lipid lowering for prevention of coronary heart disease: data from the 1995 Scottish health survey
  • Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis
  • Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity
  • Using clinical evidence
  • Improving the quality of surgeons' treatment decisions: a comparison of clinical decision making with a computerised evidence based decision analytical model
  • Applying the results of trials and systematic reviews to our individual patients
  • The impact of patients' preferences on the treatment of atrial fibrillation: observational study of patient based decision analysis Commentary: patients, preferences, and evidence
  • Identification of Risk Factors in Hypertensive Patients : Contribution of Randomized Controlled Trials Through an Individual Patient Database
  • Use of antithrombotic measures for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation
  • Methods in health services research: Interpreting the evidence: choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies
  • Risk Assessment and Anticoagulation for Primary Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation
  • A systematic review of the effects of screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult
  • Getting research findings into practice: Decision analysis and the implementation of research findings
  • Personal paper: Ethics and evidence based medicine
  • Using cost-effectiveness for subsidy decisions
  • Authors' reply
  • The relation between treatment benefit and underlying risk in meta-analysis
  • Commentary: Predicting and preventing premature mortality
  • GPs' management of acute back pain
  • Randomised controlled trials in general practice
Back to top