Intended for healthcare professionals

Education And Debate

Smuggling and cross border shopping of tobacco in Europe

BMJ 1995; 310 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6991.1393 (Published 27 May 1995) Cite this as: BMJ 1995;310:1393
  1. Luk Joossens, research sociologista,
  2. Martin Raw, honorary senior lecturerb
  1. a Centre de Recherche et d'Information des Organisations de Consommateurs, Brussels
  2. b Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Kings College School of Medicine and Dentistry, London SE5 9PJ
  1. Correspondence to: Dr L Joossens, Rue des Chevaliers 18, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.
  • Accepted 9 May 1995

Governments have recently become concerned about cross border shopping and smuggling because it can decrease tax revenue. The tobacco industry predicted that, with the removal of border controls in the European Union, price differences between neighbouring countries would lead to a diversion of tobacco trade, legally and illegally, to countries with cheaper cigarettes. According to them this diversion would be through increased cross border shopping for personal consumption or through increased smuggling of cheap cigarettes from countries with low tax to countries with high tax, where cigarettes are more expensive. These arguments have been used to urge governments not to increase tax on tobacco products. The evidence suggests, however, that cross border shopping is not yet a problem in Europe and that smuggling is not of cheap cigarettes to expensive countries. Instead, more expensive “international” brands are smuggled into northern Europe and sold illegally on the streets of the cheaper countries of southern Europe.

In the past few years governments in many countries have become concerned about cross border shopping and smuggling because it can lead to loss of tax revenue. Until recently, increasing tobacco tax has always resulted in an increase in real terms of tax revenue in all European countries. The tobacco industry predicted that the removal of border controls within the European Union would change this and that price differences between neighbouring countries would lead to a diversion of tobacco trade, legally and illegally, to countries with cheaper cigarettes.1 According to the industry, this diversion would be either through increased cross border shopping for personal consumption or through increased smuggling of cheap cigarettes from countries with lower tax to countries with high tax, where cigarettes are more expensive.

At first sight such claims might seem to reflect real concern for business from honest tax paying citizens. …

View Full Text

Log in

Log in through your institution

Subscribe

* For online subscription