Intended for healthcare professionals

  1. News & Views
  2. Misleading meta-analysis
  3. Misleading meta-analysis
Editorials

Misleading meta-analysis

BMJ 1995; 310 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6982.752 (Published 25 March 1995) Cite this as: BMJ 1995;310:752

Related articles

See more

Cited by...

  • Enough evidence and other endings: a descriptive study of stable Cochrane systematic reviews in 2019
  • Nucleus accumbens volume is related to obesity measures in an age-dependent fashion
  • How does under-reporting of negative and inconclusive results affect the false-positive rate in meta-analysis? A simulation study
  • Cognitive-behavioural therapy for the symptoms of schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis with examination of potential bias
  • The heterogeneity of cognitive symptoms in Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis
  • Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials
  • Metabolic modulation in heart failure: high time for a definitive clinical trial
  • Integration of subclassification strategies in randomised controlled clinical trials evaluating manual therapy treatment and exercise therapy for non-specific chronic low back pain: a systematic review
  • Reply to D Laurin and P-H Carmichael
  • Novel methods to deal with publication biases: secondary analysis of antidepressant trials in the FDA trial registry database and related journal publications
  • Preferential publication of editorial board members in medical specialty journals
  • Systematic review of publication bias in studies on publication bias
  • Payments for care at private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Glutathione S-transferase M1, T1 status and the risk of head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis
  • Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
  • Overview of research designs
  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing mortality rates of private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals
  • Antiplatelet drugs for prevention of pre-eclampsia and its consequences: systematic review
  • Inhaled disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) as maintenance therapy in children with asthma: a systematic review
  • Reanalysis of epidemiological evidence on lung cancer and passive smoking
  • Systematic review of trials comparing antibiotic with placebo for acute cough in adults
  • Quantitive systematic review of topically applied non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
  • Meta-analysis: Unresolved issues and future developments
  • meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies
  • Medical Editors Trial Amnesty (META)
  • Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
  • Pharmaceutical industry is invited to respond to amnesty for unreported trials
  • How to read a paper: Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses)
  • Meta-analysis and the meta-epidemiology of clinical research
  • An amnesty for unpublished trials
  • Detecting the effects of thromboprophylaxis: the case of the rogue reviews
  • Impact of postmenopausal hormone therapy on cardiovascular events and cancer
  • Clinical academic medicine: a Socratic dialogue
  • Glucose-Insulin-Potassium Therapy for Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction : An Overview of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials
  • Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountability
  • Passive smoking and health: should we believe Philip Morris's "experts"?
  • Family interventions in schizophrenia
  • Misleading meta-analysis
  • Misleading meta-analysis
  • Magnesium in Acute MI : Timing Is Critical
  • Misleading meta-analysis
  • Prospective registration of health care research would help
  • Misleading meta-analysis
  • Registers for clinical trials already exist
  • Variability among studies should be investigated
  • Magnesium, myocardial infarction, meta-analysis and megatrials
  • Magnesium in acute myocardial infarction
Back to top