The joy of uncircumcising
BMJ 1994; 309 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6955.676a (Published 10 September 1994) Cite this as: BMJ 1994;309:676All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
To the editor,
In response to the letter by George Hill “The Joy of Uncircumcision:
A Decade Later” I would like to give some input on this subject.
In the UK the rate of circumcision through the National Health
Service has been quoted to me as 5% by the Department of Health for
medical reasons. Although met with silence if the ‘circumcision clinics’
are mentioned within National Health Service these clinics appear to have
been set up to perform religious circumcisions within the NHS. Total
figures of male population circumcised have been quoted as 15.8% that
would take into account these religious circumcisions.
From my own experience being a male circumcised within the NHS at
eight days old back in 1949 I can attest to the trauma such treatment can
cause and how long lived the effects that get worse rather than better.
My own example is not however of any value if it were not supported
by the wave of discontented people that have been able to educate
themselves on the issue of male circumcision. Now more commonly referred
to as Male Genital Mutilation amongst those who are increasingly
considering themselves victims, this education has only been possible
because of the Internet.
Unfortunately it is not only the lives of the circumcised male that
can be adversely affected, it also extends to the family of that person.
If the process has caused lasting effects often starting as a ‘clingy
child’ or a shy and retarded individual it can also have effects of
increased anger and obsessive behavior. Sexual frustrations can build as
age takes it’s toll on relationships that are added to by the already
desensitized penis. Constant background sensation would appear to build
up a brain threshold as it does with those who suffer constant pain.
Sexual intercourse to ejaculation must be accompanied by added stimulation
to rise well above the threshold level making sex vigorous and of longer
duration, far less gentle than the female would wish. Frustrations like
this are an added risk to relationships if they are to survive into old
age.
I know from the requests for simple products and the analysis of
website statistics that this interest in foreskin restoration is growing.
I also know from personal responses sent to me that there is growing anger
about their circumcision, not always the result of ‘botched’
circumcisions.
The ignorance that still exists about the foreskin and glans does not
do justice to the medical profession that amputate highly sensitive and
functional skin from the penis, often from those that did not and could
not give consent (children). I have a suspicion that the reaction between
the glans, frenulum, ridge bands and the nervous system during sex is far
more complex than sensitivity or the number of nerves present in the
penis. Those who are perhaps rather cynical may conclude that the medical
profession is not yet advanced enough to tackle a subject that at present
is way beyond their capabilities.
Kevin J. Elks.
Stop Mutilating Children.
Etondale, Slip Lane,
Alkham,
Dover, Kent. CT15 7EF
Web: http://www.stop-mutilating-children.org.uk
Restoration Web: http://www.foreskin-restoration.eu.com
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests
To the Editor:
A decade has passed since the publication of this anonymous report by someone who restored his foreskin.1 Since the publication of this report, the popularity of foreskin restoration among circumcised males has soared (although from a very low base).
The medical community has remained aloof and embarrassed by the success and popularity of foreskin restoration. Little has been published in the literature in the decade since the publication of this report. However, the disapproval of the medical community has not stopped growth of the foreskin restoration movement.
Laymen have invented and developed a wide range of ingenious devices to assist in the application of traction to the residual shaft skin to encourage tissue expansion, which may be found on the Internet. Use of these devices speeds a slow process and makes the undertaking of foreskin restoration more attractive.
The number of foreskin restorers is unknown because foreskin restoration is private matter, however the sale of books and devices, and the presence of mail lists on the Internet indicate an ever-increasing popularity. Circumcised males in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, the United States, and elsewhere either have restored or are restoring their foreskins.
The ridged band of highly innervated and vascularised tissue occurs near the tip of the foreskin, so it is always removed by circumcision,2 and cannot be restored. Some nerves, however, are present in the shaft skin from the distal margin to where hairy skin begins;3 foreskin restoration restores the mobility of the shaft skin, enabling more stimulation of these residual nerves during coitus, and probably accounts for most of the increase in sensation reported by a multitude of restoring males.
A recent cost-utility analysis firmly establishes that neonatal circumcision has a net adverse impact on health.4 Boyle et al. have proposed foreskin restoration as a treatment for the psychological ills that afflict some circumcised males.5 It is time for the world medical community to renounce child circumcision and to embrace foreskin restoration. Research is needed to establish the best and fastest ways to restore foreskins. How does restoration increase sensation? Would topical application of human growth hormone (HGH) improve the rate of skin growth? The medical community should conduct controlled studies to answer these questions and others and to assist wounded men in repairing the damage done by circumcision.
George Hill
Executive Secretary
Doctors Opposing Circumcision
Suite 42
2442 NW Market Street
Seattle, Washington 98107
USA
Web: http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcsion.org/References
- 1. Anonymous. The joy of uncircumcising. BMJ 1994;309:676-7.
- 2. Taylor JR, Lockwood AP, Taylor AJ. The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision. Br J Urol 1996;77:291-5.
- 3. Winkelmann RK. The erogenous zones: their nerve supply and significance. Mayo Clin Proc 1959;34(2):39-47.
- 4. Van Howe RS. A cost-utility analysis of neonatal circumcision. Med Decis Making 2004;24:584-601.
- Boyle GJ, Goldman R, Svoboda JS, Fernandez E. Male circumcision: pain, trauma and psychosexual sequelae. J Health Psychology 2002;7(3):329-43.
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests
...if I could only undo this....
Well now. The subject of uncircumcision reminds me of the mother who
ran after the baby that had been thrown out with the bath water.
And, then again, it reminds me even more vividly of THIS young lad who, in
the early days of his wondrous sexual discovery, had taken full and
satisfying advantage of a romantic dinner of MacDonalds, Italian
Valpolicella and el cheapo candles in his university quarters and
succeeded to enter (what had been agreed upon as)highly classified and
forbidden territory.
The urge to UNDO soon escalated into outright panic and - from memory - it
was then left to the Gods. Who did show mercy.
If I had been blessed with foolish parents I would have been circumcised
and I would, no doubt, be one of the people who seek the truth in
achieving and experiencing the full sensory experience we are meant to
have.
From an entirely sober medical viewpoint, it is highly unlikely that
restoration of the missing links will do anything beyond an improved
cosmetic appearance but there is always the placebo effect.
Circumcision, the world needs to be told, is no more necessary than
tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy and most other -ectomies.
My wife actually has a name for the friendly fellow.
She says leave 'well enough' alone.
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests