Formal measurement of clinical uncertainty: prelude to a trial in perinatal medicineBMJ 1994; 308 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.308.6921.111 (Published 08 January 1994) Cite this as: BMJ 1994;308:111
- R Lilford for the Fetal Compromise Group
- Institute of Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Leeds LS2 9LN.
Clinical trials are ethical when there is collective and balanced uncertainty about the best treatment among informed clinicians. This uncertainty can be identified either by observing differences in practice or, as explored here, by formal measurement of clinical belief.
Fetomaternal medicine is largely concerned with timing delivery of preterm fetuses that are failing to thrive. Delivery is indicated when prematurity is judged preferable to continued intrauterine life, but often the relative risks of these alternatives are unknown.1 During the planning of a trial to compare early with delayed delivery under different circumstances 10 specialists in fetomaternal medicine were interviewed about their beliefs.
Methods and results
The specialists were presented with four scenarios, one practice and three substantive, in each of which the decision between immediate and delayed delivery was difficult (see figure). They recorded their opinions on an analogue dial connected to a microcomputer. For each scenario respondents were asked what they thought the relative risk of permanent morbidity …