Articles British Medical Journal Br Med J 1896; 2 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.1859.401 (Published 15 August 1896) Cite this as: Br Med J 1896;2:401 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Correction Correction Published: 13 September 1930; Br Med J 2 doi:10.1136/bmj.2.3636.456 Correction Correction Published: 06 September 1952; Br Med J 2 doi:10.1136/bmj.2.4783.572 See more Doctors launch bid to challenge GMC over its failure to act on “high profile doctors” who spread vaccine misinformation BMJ May 26, 2023, 381 p1220; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p1220 UK will consult on disclosure of industry payments to doctors ahead of possible legislation BMJ May 26, 2023, 381 p1219; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p1219 Hampshire consultant’s dismissal for whistleblowing is “unacceptable,” says BMA BMJ May 26, 2023, 381 p1218; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p1218 Labour’s promises on health are setting the party up to fail BMJ May 26, 2023, 381 p1217; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p1217 Harassment in the NHS: could the solution be the problem? BMJ May 26, 2023, 381 p1171; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p1171 Cited by... Practical virtue ethics: healthcare whistleblowing and portable digital technologyAbstract Fulltext PDF
