Set targets to cut inhaled anaesthesia greenhouse gas emissions
Regulatory framework for mandatory reporting and accountability essential
Clear, measurable targets are needed to cut potent greenhouse gas emissions from inhaled anaesthesia and minimise their impact on climate change, insist doctors in The BMJ.
Reliance on voluntary efforts simply won’t achieve progress at the scale and speed required, they warn. A regulatory framework for mandatory reporting and accountability, involving a broad spectrum of all those involved in healthcare is critical to success, they say.
Healthcare accounts for nearly 5% of all global greenhouse gas emissions. And inhaled anaesthetic gases may make up as much as 3% of the national total produced by the NHS in England alone.
All inhaled anaesthetics, such as desflurane, sevoflurane, isoflurane, and nitrous oxide (N₂O) are powerful greenhouse gases with heat-trapping qualities hundreds to thousands of times stronger than an equivalent mass of carbon dioxide (CO2).
And N₂O, which is widely used in dental clinics and for pain relief during labour, also contributes to thinning of the ozone layer. As well as its use in pain relief and sedation, N₂O is used as a refrigerant for cryosurgery.
Inhaled anaesthetics are ultimately all released into the outside atmosphere. What’s more, between 77% and 95% of hospital N₂O is lost through leaking pipes before it even gets to a patient.
It’s not clear if new anaesthetic waste management technology is sufficiently effective, especially after all appropriate steps have been taken to reduce waste and select lower emissions substitutes, say Drs Jodi Sherman and Brian Chesebro, from, respectively, Yale School of Medicine, and Providence Health and Services, Oregon Region.
The harmful effects of inhaled anaesthetic gases on the planet are widely acknowledged. But not enough has been done to lessen these effects.
Avoiding the use of inhaled anaesthetics where it’s safe to do so and curbing waste should be prioritised, say the authors. But measuring emissions, setting clear reduction targets and timelines, and tracking progress are essential for all health systems to effect change at the pace and scale required, they argue.
“With their core mission to support health and healing, all health professionals have a duty to prevent environmental pollution,” write the authors. But everyone working in healthcare needs to be involved, given how widely used inhaled anaesthesia and pain relief are, they argue.
That means engineers and policy makers, as well those working in admin, industry and government, and other sectors, such as veterinary medicine and dentistry.
“Efforts to decarbonise healthcare risk not going far enough or fast enough if progress relies on the voluntary initiative of individual clinicians, facilities, or health systems,” write the authors. “A regulatory framework of standardised mandatory reporting and accountability is critical to achieve the widespread engagement required to reduce healthcare’s substantial greenhouse gas emissions,” they conclude.
Notes for editors
Editorial: Inhaled anaesthesia and analgesia contribute to climate change doi: 10.1136/bmj.o1301
Journal: The BMJ
Link to Academy of Medical Sciences press release labelling system: