Intended for healthcare professionals

Randomised controlled trial of homoeopathy versus placebo in perennial allergic rhinitis with overview of four trial seriesCommentary: Larger trials are needed

Morag A Taylor, Tim Lancaster, David Reilly, Robert H Llewellyn-Jones, Charles McSharry, Tom C Aitchison, Andrew Vickers
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.321.7259.471 Published 19 August 2000
Fig 2
Fig 2

Mean (SE) weekly change from baseline in nasal inspiratory peak flow

Vol 385 Issue 8425 Table of Contents
BMJ:

  • Respond to this article

  • Print
  • Alerts & updates

    Article alerts

    Please note: your email address is provided to the journal, which may use this information for marketing purposes.

    Log in or register:

    Register for alerts

    If you have registered for alerts, you should use your registered email address as your username
  • Citation tools

    Download this article to citation manager

    Taylor M A, Lancaster T, Reilly D, Llewellyn-Jones R H, McSharry C, Aitchison T C et al. Randomised controlled trial of homoeopathy versus placebo in perennial allergic rhinitis with overview of four trial seriesCommentary: Larger trials are needed BMJ 2000; 321 :471 doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7259.471

    Help

    If you are unable to import citations, please contact technical support for your product directly (links go to external sites):

  • Request permissions

Subjects