The editorialists write: "It did not originate from a particular biophysical hypothesis or results of a seminal study but from a concern that some aspect of the interaction between radiofrequency fields and human physiology has been overlooked or misunderstood." In truth, it arose mostly from a hysterical fear of the unknown, ruthlessly encouraged by the media.
I agree with Peter English: there are better things, and more important risks to public health, on which to spend research money.
Rapid Response:
Re: Mobile telephones and brain tumours
The editorialists write: "It did not originate from a particular biophysical hypothesis or results of a seminal study but from a concern that some aspect of the interaction between radiofrequency fields and human physiology has been overlooked or misunderstood." In truth, it arose mostly from a hysterical fear of the unknown, ruthlessly encouraged by the media.
I agree with Peter English: there are better things, and more important risks to public health, on which to spend research money.
Competing interests: No competing interests